Your Council!Your Council

 

ORGANISATION SCRUTINY COMMITTEE

RECORD OF MEETING HELD ON 23RD JULY 2007

Present:

Councillor A C Johnson; Chair

Councillors W T Beard, J A Beech, D H D Charlesworth, H W Curran, A Moran and

J Lewis

In Attendance:

Ralph Bason                     Elections Manager

Lisa Carr                          Policy and Performance Officer

Jennifer Cross                   Executive Director (Treasury & Corporate Support)

Harvey Woodward              Senior Accountancy Assistant

Carol Jones                       Democratic Services Officer

Non-Committee Member in attendance:

Councillor J K Hatfield        Portfolio Holder for Human Resources

Apologies:               Councillors R E Dodd, B Evans and K Healey

 

11        DECLARATIONS OF INTEREST

No other Member made any declaration of interest in any item of business on the agenda.

 

12        WHIPPING DECLARATIONS

In accordance with Paragraph 18 of the Performance and Overview Procedure Rules, Members were invited to declare in respect of items where the whip had been applied.  No such declarations were made.

 

13        RECORDS OF MEETINGS

AGREED:  (a) That the Record of the Meeting held on 25th May 2007 be approved as correct; and

(b) That the Record of the Special Meeting held on 25th June 2007 be approved as correct.

 

14        BOARD BUSINESS

14.1         Meeting 26th July 2007

The Committee was invited to comment on Board reports which fell within its remit.

Item 7      Further Electoral Review of Crewe and Nantwich

The Boundary Committee’s final recommendations in respect of the electoral Review of Crewe and Nantwich had been published. 

The Committee commented that if the Electoral Commission accepted the recommendations, there would be “all out” elections in May 2008, a consequence of which would be that some Ward Councillors would be due for re-election in 2010.

Item 10     Asset Management Plan – 2007/2011

The report recommended a revised Asset Management Plan which included the outcomes of the asset condition surveys and also took a “backward look” to show progress in the management of the Council’s assets.

At some stage, it would be necessary to consider whether to retain or dispose of certain buildings. The Executive Director (Treasury and Corporate Support) would be preparing an Action Plan for consideration by the Scrutiny Committee in due course.

14.2         Exclusion of Press and Public

RESOLVED:  That the press and public be excluded from the meeting during consideration of the following item pursuant to Section 100(A)(4) of the Local Government Act 1972 on the ground that it involved the likely disclosure of exempt information as defined in Paragraph 3 of Part 1 of Schedule 12A (as amended) of the Act.

Item 18           Insurance Cover and Capacity Issues Within the Revenues

                      Section (Paragraph 3)

AGREED: That the Board be informed that the Committee gave specific support to the addition of a member of staff onto the establishment.

14.3         Re-admittance of Press and Public

RESOLVED:  That the press and public be re-admitted to the meeting.

14.4    During discussion of Board reports, Members commented on the difficulty of giving due consideration to the items in the absence of the supporting documents. It was noted that whilst these been lodged in the Members’ Room, copies had only been made available to Board Members and Scrutiny Committee Chairs.  The Committee was informed that in an effort to reduce the volume of hard copies, the Board had introduced this system a few months previously.  It was AGREED that the issue be raised with Board Members, with a view to reviewing these arrangements.

(Note:  Councillor J K Hatfield participated in the discussion of Board reports.)

14.5     Provisional Items (Board’s Forward Plan)

The Committee noted the provisional list of items for September 2007.

14.6     Responses/Referrals from the Board or Council

At the previous meeting, the Committee had commented on a Board report (Wulvern Housing – Governance Review).  At its meeting held on 31st May, the Board took into account the Committee’s comments, together with the comments from the other two Scrutiny Committees and deferred making a decision, referring the item to the Organisation Scrutiny Committee for consideration and recommendation back to the Board at the earliest opportunity.

The Organisation Scrutiny Committee held a special meeting on 25th June 2007 (as noted in Record No. 13 above) and its recommendation to Board as detailed in the Record of Meeting above was noted.

15               PERFORMANCE MONITORING

15.5      Best Value Performance Indicators

Lisa Carr was in attendance for this item.

The Committee considered the report of the Policy and Performance Officer in respect of the performance indicators which were monitored by the Committee.  No specific comments were made.

15.2     Financial Out-Turn – 2006/2007

The Committee noted the Financial Out-Turn which had been submitted to full Council on 27th June 2007.

15.3     Financial Monitoring – 1st April 2007 – 30th June 2007

Harvey Woodward was in attendance for this item.

The Committee noted the financial monitoring report for the first quarter.  No specific comments were made.

15.4     Efficiency Plan – 2006-2007

Harvey Woodward was in attendance for this item.

Members noted the out-turn on efficiency savings for 2006/2007 compared with expected savings for the same period.

 

16        WORK PROGRAMME

16.1    Emergency Planning

It was noted that Paul Eeles, Emergency Planning Officer, and Roger Booth,       District Emergency Planner would make a presentation to the Committee at its November meeting.

16.2     Election Process

Ralph Bason was in attendance for this item.

The Committee considered the report of the Elections Manager which outlined the process leading up to the elections held on 3rd May 2007.

The Committee was informed that a review of polling stations was due to be undertaken, following which a report would be submitted to the Board in the Autumn.  The review would include consideration of the locations and accessibility. 

A comment was made that members of the public were often unaware of the elections process;  as an example, many electors believed that they were required to take their polling cards to the polling station.  The Elections Manager agreed to give consideration to improving the information provided for members of the public.

16.3      Referral from Audit Committee – ICT Service Provision

            for Members

The newly-established Audit Committee had asked the Organisation Scrutiny Committee to review the ICT service provision for Members, taking into account whether Thin Client Technology (TCT) was proving to be sufficiently effective.  The Audit Committee had expressed the view that the current service provision was not acceptable, but had not given detailed reasons.

The following issues were raised during discussion of this item -

Ø                  Information technology had advanced since TCT had been introduced and it may not be the most appropriate method for Councillors.

Ø                  Should TCT be examined in isolation?

Ø                  How were problems to be identified?

Ø                  What was the intended outcome?

Ø                  Was replacement more costly than retaining TCT?

Ø                  The risk for Members was that replacement of TCT with PCs could reduce the level of support from IT staff.

Ø                  Councillors now made more extensive use of the technology and it was timely to review the service.

Ø                  There were a number of “expert” Councillors who may be able to assist in the review.

In response to a question about the possibility of “piggy-backing” TCT onto Councillors’ own personal computers (PCs), the Committee was informed that this represented a security risk. There was a greater potential for viruses on a PC infecting the whole network.

The Executive Director (Treasury and Corporate Support) reminded Members of the principal reasons for the introduction of TCT. 

-       Reasonably secure.

-       Used common office suites.

-       TCT removed the requirement for Councillors to back-up their work

-       IT staff could remotely support Councillors (shadowing)

-       PCs were approximately £1,000 each at that time and TCT represented better value for money. The cost of PCs had now reduced to approximately £400.

The Committee agreed that the following information would be helpful to the Committee  –

-        Analysis of the issues raised with the Help Desk.  (The Executive Director reported that there were misconceptions about the efficiency of the service.  At present, there were no outstanding calls on the Help Desk.)

-         The number of Members who used TCT

-         The cost per line.

-         The number of lines where problems were experienced.

The Executive Director (Treasury and Corporate Support) suggested that as part of the review she could develop a questionnaire to survey Councillors about their needs and their IT abilities.

AGREED: (a) That ICT Service Provision for Councillors be reviewed by the Committee;

(b) That, as a starting point, the Executive Director (Treasury and Corporate Support) provide an analysis of issues raised with the Help Desk;

(c) That the Executive Director (Treasury and Corporate Support) draft Terms of Reference for the review, to be issued to Members of the Committee;

(d) That a presentation be made at the September or November meeting, following collation of appropriate information; and

(e) That, subject to room availability, the next meeting be held in the Council Chamber.

16.4     Communications and Press and Media Relations

The Committee had agreed to review communications as it applied across the authority from a policy and practice perspective and its links with Members.

AGREED:  That at its meeting in September, the Communications Manager make a presentation to the Committee outlining her role and that of the Communications Team.

16.5     Member Support and Development

The Committee had already agreed that this topic be reviewed and was now invited to schedule it into its work programme.  The principal reason for the review was that in recent years abortive costs were accruing to the authority, on a regular basis, as a result of late cancellations of training sessions which had been arranged in accordance with the Member Development Programme.

It was AGREED that at its meeting in September, the Committee receive a presentation which addressed the issue of the abortive costs but also covered the following -

-        Did the Member Development Programme meet Members’ needs, taking into account personal development and training considered to be mandatory?

-        Were the topic areas appropriate?  Did they engage Members?

-        Did the method of delivery engage Members?

-        What was the nature of difficulties experienced in attracting Members to specific training sessions?

-        Timing of training sessions:  Most training sessions were held during the day and often inconvenient for those Councillors in employment.   Should they be re-scheduled to the evening in an effort to attract greater attendance?

-        What was the value of Member training?  Should it continue or be abandoned?

-        Were training sessions promoted adequately and in a timely manner?

-        The nature of difficulties experienced in attracting Members to specific topic areas.

16.6         Climate Change Task Group

The Local Economy and Environment Scrutiny Committee had established a task group on Climate Change and had requested each of the other two Scrutiny Committees to appoint two Members to it.  The Terms of Reference for the review were noted.

During discussion, comment was made that there was a potential conflict of interest for this Committee if two of its members were appointed to the Task Group.  On balance, it was AGREED that it was more appropriate for the Local Economy and Environment Scrutiny Committee to review the topic and the Committee therefore declined to make any nominations.

 

17                DATE OF NEXT MEETING

17th September 2007

 

………………………………………………….Chair