Your Council!Your Council

 

                                                 LOCAL ECONOMY & ENVIRONMENT

SCRUTINY COMMITTEE

          RECORD OF MEETING HELD ON 11TH SEPTEMBER 2007      

 

 

Present: 

Councillor K Healey (Chairman);

Councillors A Crawford, M A Hollins, A C Johnson, S J S Mottram, R W Parker, S Roberts and R Stafford    

       

Officers in Attendance (for whole or part):       

K Boughey                  Climate Change Officer, Direct Services                            

P Burns                      Business Development Management, Direct Services

R Goddard                   Assistant Solicitor

J Griffiths                     Business Manager: Enforcement

V Jeffrey                      Head of Housing

J  McMillan                  Cultural Development Manager

A Millington                  Borough Planning Officer  

J Rounce                     Consultation Manager

G Roberts                    Economic Development and Estates Manager

J Smith                        Democratic Services Officer

 

In Attendance (for whole or part): 

Councillor W S Davies

Cathy Newbury, External Consultant

 

 

Apologies:

Councillors M Campbell, R Cartlidge, P A Hallett and L T Wood               

 


27.    DECLARATIONS OF INTEREST

 

No Member declared any personal or prejudicial interest in respect of any item of business on the agenda.         


28.    RECORD OF MEETING

 

AGREED: That the record of the meeting held on 7th August 2007 be approved as correct.        


29.    WHIPPING DECLARATIONS

 

In accordance with Paragraph 18 of the Performance and Overview Procedure Rules, Members were invited to declare in respect of items where the whip had been applied.  No such declarations were made. 


30.     RESPONSES FROM THE BOARD       

                  

No comments were forwarded to the Board from the Committee’s meeting on 3rd August; therefore there were no responses to report.

  


31.    REFERRALS FROM THE BOARD/COUNCIL                                 

 

The Committee noted that there were no responses/referrals from the Board/Council on this occasion. 


32.     FORWARD PLAN OF BOARD DECISIONS                                  

 

The Committee received the Board’s Forward Plan for 15th November 2007 and 3rd January 2008.     

 

32.1         Topics for Consideration 

 

One report was identified as an area of interest for the Committee: Consultation and Amendment – Off-Street Parking Places Order. Members requested that this topic be brought forward for consideration by the Committee. 

             


33.        PUBLIC ART STRATEGY

 

The Public Art Strategy was scheduled for consideration by the Board at its meeting to be held on 20th September 2007.  The document would outline the strategy’s contribution towards major re-development in the Borough of Crewe and Nantwich by means of developing a quality public realm which would enhance projects that enable greater access to the countryside, cultural development, community engagement and tourism. 

Cathy Newbury, external Public Art Consultant and Curator attended the meeting to provide an update for Members on the current position and explore the role of the Local Economy and Environment Scrutiny Committee in delivering the strategy.

Members had received copies of the draft Strategy and their attention was drawn to section 3: Crewe and Nantwich Implementation Plan. The requirement to ensure that priorities were constantly reviewed, updated, endorsed, replaced and aligned to the Policy was highlighted.   The following comments/queries were raised by Members:

 A Member referred to the opportunities listed in the Implementation Plan and suggested that the Green Space Strategy was more important than the others listed under Open Space.  Cathy Newbury explained that if it was felt that this should be the priority area then this could be reflected in the plan and prioritising opportunities was an area where Member involvement would be welcomed.

The opportunities that would be available with the re-development of Crewe Town Centre were highlighted and a query was raised on how Modus would be participating.  The Borough Planning Officer explained that there were funds identified within the planning application and there was a commitment from Modus to participate. He also re-iterated the need to ensure that other opportunities throughout the Borough were not missed.

The Economic Development and Estates Manager added that Public Art helped to regenerate areas substantially and there was evidence of this throughout the country.  There were also benefits for the visitor economy.  The Council was currently submitting bids for NWDA regional funding in respect of Public Art/Gateway proposals and the development of the strategy would assist with this bid.

The consultant explained the role Councillors would play in the implementation of the strategy which would include Member involvement on the selection panels.  Clarity in respect of decision making powers would be sought to ensure that this was a transparent process.

The Cultural Development Manager and the Consultant in attendance were thanked for their input.            

                     

33.    LOCAL AREA AGREEMENTS: 4TH BLOCK ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT &  ENTERPRISE    

 

The Committee received a brief interim report on the 4th Block of the Cheshire Local Area Agreement (CLAA).  The CLAA was themed around 4 blocks, the fourth one being the Economic Development and Enterprise Block.  The report outlined the key priorities for the 4th Block and gave a brief update on the CLAA.  It was noted that the Local Strategic Partnership Manager would be attending the October meeting to present a more detailed report on the Cheshire Local Area Agreement: 4th Block.

         


34.    ‘HOMES FOR THE FUTURE: MORE AFFORDABLE, MORE SUSTAINABLE’

         HOUSING GREEN PAPER

 

The Government’s Green Paper ‘Homes for the Future’ had been published for consultation. Views were sought on the Government’s proposals to increase the supply of housing, to provide well designed and greener homes that were supported by infrastructure and to provide more affordable homes to buy or rent. 

The report of the Head of Housing provided an outline of the main issues in the paper and the Head of Housing attended the meeting to present her report.   

 

The following issues were highlighted:

 

v    Proposals for more social (rented) and shared ownership homes in rural areas.

v    Local authorities would be encouraged to work with other stakeholders to improve the prospects and pace of housing delivery. These would be known as Local Delivery Vehicles. 

v    A new Housing, Planning and Delivery grant would be introduced to replace the current Planning Delivery Grant.  The new grant would direct extra resources to those Councils who were delivering high levels of housing.

v    The Government’s approach to eliminating poor development and ensuring that new homes and places meet the needs of all sections of the Community through the use of Planning Policy Statement 3 (PPS3).

The Borough Planning Officer added that the new planning grant would not be purely based on the number of houses; performance and plan production would still be factors when assessing the grant. 

A Member asked if the new grant would benefit Councils in the South East where higher levels of houses were being built. The Head of Housing explained that there was no clarity on this issue in the Green Paper and it was difficult to make a judgement at the present time. 

The Committee discussed the difficulties in the provision of affordable housing in the current housing market climate and the need to place restrictions to retain the affordability of housing.  

The Head of Housing was thanked for her report.

      


35.    CREWE TOWN CENTRE UPDATE

 

The Borough Planning Officer provided a brief progress report on town centre matters covering the Development Agreement, Compulsory Purchase Order and Section 106 Agreement associated with the Modus development, new office accommodation and the development of Market Square.


36.    VACANCY PANEL DECISIONS 

 

The Committee received the report of the Human Resources Manager and noted the decisions of the Vacancy Panel which fall under the remit of the Committee.


37.    DOG CONTROL ORDER

 

At its meeting in April 2007, the Committee considered four of the elements which would form part of a proposed Dog Control Order:

 

Fouling of land by dogs;

Dogs on lead;

Number of dogs which a person may take on to land; and

Penalty notices.

                  

At the time it was agreed that the remaining proposal, Dog Exclusion would be considered at a future meeting.

 

In the interim, a Consultation exercise had been conducted on the proposals set out in the Order. The report of the Consultation Manager was submitted to the meeting and provided an objective summary of the responses received highlighting emerging themes.

 

The Consultation Manager presented his report to the Committee. The Council had consulted on the proposals for new Dog Control Orders and, in total, 283 responses were received. He explained that the report contained a summary of the overall responses to the five main elements of the proposals and it also contained proposals for the next phases of the consultation.

 

The Assistant Solicitor provided an update on the level of fine that could be imposed. She explained that the Environmental Offences (Fixed Penalties)  (Miscellaneous Provisions) Regulations 2007 set the range of fixed penalties that may be charged for offences under Dog Control Orders made under the       Clean Neighbourhoods and Environment Act 2005. The range was between £50 and £80 and where a Local Authority did not fix its own level of fixed penalty, the amount was set at £75 by the Act.

 

The following comments/questions were made:

 

v      There would be difficulties in identifying areas where there were football pitches or open field without fencing. The Assistant Solicitor commented that there would be a list of areas identified in the schedule and a list of football pitches could be added to this for clarity.

v      A question was asked in respect of what would happen next following the results of this consultation. The report highlighted the next stages of further consultation which would be carried out in three phases.

v      A query was raised on whether there would be an exemption on working dogs as this could cause problems in rural areas. The Assistant Solicitor explained that no specific reference was made to Working Dogs on the prescribed forms. She commented that working dogs would usually be working on private land and would be under control while working.  However she would research this issue further and report back.

v      A Member suggested that a percentage of the money raised from fines should be used for education and prevention. The Business Manager, Enforcement explained that the Council was governed by DEFRA in this respect and the Council currently ring-fenced a percentage of the money received for litter fines to use for educational materials on environmental issues.

 

The Consultation Manager outlined the next stages of the consultation process which consisted of three consultation phases as detailed in the report.

 

AGREED: That the consultation process, as outlined in the report, be supported.

 

(Note: In accordance with Procedure Rule 26(2), Councillor W S Davies spoke on this item with the permission of the Committee.)


 

38.    WORK PROGRAMME 2007   

 

38.1         Task Group Update   

 

The Committee received the following updates in respect of the work of the Task Groups. 

 

38.2         Climate Change Task Group 

 

The Climate Change Task Group had not yet met. The Business Development Manager provided a brief verbal update on the work being undertaken by Officers in respect of the Climate Change agenda and explained that he would provide a written update for Members via e-mail.  Keith Boughey, who was also in attendance at the meeting, would be the Council’s Lead Officer on Climate Change.

 

38.3         Town Centres Task Group

 

The Economic Development and Estates Manager asked Members to consider if they still wished to have a Scrutiny Committee task group to cover Town Centres.  He explained that the Committee could receive a monthly update each month which would provide information on the current position in respect of town centres.

 

The Committee discussed the proposal but felt that there was still a scrutiny role for this group as the Crewe Town Centre Advisory Group was a Portfolio-Holder led group.

 

AGREED: That the LEE, Scrutiny Committee retain the current Town Centre Task Group.

 

38.4         Waste Management Task Group

                  

There was nothing to report back from this group.  However a Member reported the outcome of the decision in respect of the Clayhanger site. 


 

26.    DATE OF NEXT MEETING

16th October 2007

 


 

…………………….  Chair