Your Council!Your Council

 

                                                                    LOCAL ECONOMY & ENVIRONMENT

SCRUTINY COMMITTEE

   RECORD OF MEETING HELD ON 7TH AUGUST 2007      

 

Present: 

Councillor P A Hallett (Chair);

Councillors M A Hollins, A C Johnson, S J S Mottram, S Roberts and L T Wood     

       

Officers in Attendance (for whole or part):       

P Ancell                        Chief Executive

K Boughey                    Senior Enforcement Officer, Direct Services                                 

P Burns                        Business Development Management, Direct Services

P Goodwin                    Assistant Director, Accountancy and Audit

A Leah                          Landscape Architect, Environment and Development 

D Marren                       Executive Director, Direct Services  

D Moulson                     Democratic Services Officer          

G Roberts                      Economic Development and Estates Manager

 

 

In Attendance (for whole or part): 

Councillor J Hammond           Portfolio Holder for Local Environment

Councillor S W Hogben

 

Apologies:

Councillors M Campbell, R Cartlidge, R W Parker and R Stafford            


11.          DECLARATIONS OF INTEREST

 

No Member declared any personal or prejudicial interest in respect of any item of business on the agenda.         


12.          RECORD OF MEETING

 

AGREED: That the record of the meeting held on 29th May 2007 be approved as correct.        


13.          WHIPPING DECLARATIONS

 

In accordance with Paragraph 18 of the Performance and Overview Procedure Rules, Members were invited to declare in respect of items where the whip had been applied. No such declarations were made. 


 


14.         RESPONSES FROM THE BOARD       

 

14.1       Appointment of Chairs to Performance and Overview (Scrutiny) Committees 

                  

The Chairs of the three Scrutiny Committees had, at Annual Council, been appointed from the same political group which made up the Council’s Board.  The Members had requested that the following statement be brought to the attention of the Board:   

 

That the Board be asked to note that the majority of Performance and Overview (P&O) Local Economy and Environment Committee Members had expressed their disappointment and concern regarding the appointment of Conservative Chairs to the P&O Committees as, in their opinion, it did not reflect the spirit of scrutiny and went against convention, best practice and legal advice”.        

 

The Board noted but did not comment on the statement.       

 

14.2       Provision of Affordable Housing

                  

The Committee made the following recommendation to the Board which was duly noted.   

 

The Board be asked to note that the Committee supports the report but requests that urgent progress be made on the issues identified”. 

 

14.3       Wulvern Housing – Governance Review

 

Proposals by Wulvern Housing to amend its governance rules had not found favour with the Committee, which had in response submitted the following recommendation to the Board:

 

“The Committee urged the Board not to agree to the proposal at this stage but enter into discussions with Wulvern Housing and the community as a whole with regard to appropriate representation on Wulvern Housing’s Board.”

 

             The Board’s Decision (12) was -  

 

             DECISION:

 

(A)        That, in the light of the comments made by the Performance and Overview Committees, a decision on this matter be deferred;

 

(B)        That the Performance and Overview Committee (Organisation) be asked to review this matter;

 

 

(C)        That a representative of Wulvern Housing be asked to attend the Performance and Overview Committee meeting to advise on the issues involved; and

 

(D)        That the Performance and Overview Committee (Organisation) be asked to make a recommendation to Board at the earliest meeting, to inform Wulvern’s decision on its governance arrangements at its Annual General Meeting on 13th September 2007.

 

A special meeting of Organisation Scrutiny Committee was held on 25 June 2007 and a copy of the outcome from the meeting was provided for Members. 


15.        REFERRALS FROM THE BOARD/COUNCIL                                 

 

The Committee noted that there were no responses/referrals from the Board/Council on this occasion. 


16.        RENAMING OF PERFORMANCE AND OVERVIEW COMMITTEE  

              

On 13th June 2007, Council resolved to rename the three Performance and Overview Committees with immediate effect.  Members noted that this Committee had become Local Economy and Environment Scrutiny Committee.       


17.        FORWARD PLAN OF BOARD DECISIONS                                  

 

The Committee received the Board’s Forward Plan for 20 September and 15 November 2007.     

 

17.1      Topics for Consideration 

Two reports were identified as areas of interest for the Committee: i) Local Development Framework – Core Strategy, issues and options; and ii) Public Art Strategy.  Members requested that both of these topics be brought forward for consideration by the Committee. 

 

In relation to public art, the Chair referred to a presentation made at Council on 27 June 2007 which had set out the background of the strategy.  Reference had been made to improving key roundabouts within the borough and the Chair questioned whether the funding, which had been allocated to this element was still available.  In response, the Chief Executive confirmed that a meeting was to be held imminently between interest parties to move the matter forward. 


 

17.2      Work Programme

 

It was reported that of the two items identified for inclusion on the agenda for July, the report on the Civic Hall Car Park had been deferred and would be considered in due course by the Town Centre Task Group.  The presentation on the LAA 4th Block Economic Development had been postponed until October, however, the Chief Executive considered that it would be in the best interest of the Committee to receive a briefing as soon as possible.  It was therefore AGREED that a short briefing paper would be submitted to the Committee in September following which a more detail presentation would be made in October.               

                          


18.        PROGRESS REPORT – QUEENS PARK

 

Restoration work on Queens Park was currently underway but concern had been expressed by Councillors and members of the public about the apparent delay in implementing the project.  The Committee had agreed at a previous meeting to review progress and as a precursor to the meeting, Members had undertaken a short walking tour of the Park to familiarise themselves with works being carried out.

 

The Landscape Architect was in attendance at the meeting to provide an update on the current position and respond to Members questions:-   

 

Dredging of the Lake

The contractor had commenced dredging, however the process had taken longer than expected due to adverse weather conditions and problems associated with disposal of the silt and removal of oil deposits.  It was noted that the source of the oil contamination was currently being investigated to ensure there was no re-occurrence. 

 

Wildfowl

The RSPCA had been consulted to ensure that suitable habitat for the waterfowl was maintained during the works and it had confirmed that plans for retaining water pockets within the lake would be acceptable. 

 

Cycleway

To comply with the conditions of the Heritage Lottery Funding (HLF) grant, a cycleway was to be provided within the perimeter of the park.  Cycling within the grounds was not presently permitted and negotiations with the HLF would be undertaken to confirm whether creating suitable routes in the vicinity would meet its requirements. 

 

Retention of Depot

The current maintenance depot was to be demolished.  Concern had been raised that doing so would result in no security presence in the park and would reduce the amount of time on site for employees forced to travel between the park and Pyms Lane.  It was not clear given the condition of the structure whether restoration was possible and as no funding had been allocated within the bid, consideration of how best to manage the situation would be required. 

  

 

Maintenance

A Member commented that it would not be acceptable for the authority to restore the park without a comprehensive maintenance plan being initiated, which would support the need to retain the presence of a depot on site.  If the interior of the park was no longer appropriate as a location, it was suggested that consideration be given to siting the facility on Tipkinder.  The Landscape Architect took on board the comments made, confirming that a 10 year maintenance plan for the park would be developed to maintain and enhance works carried out. 

 

Lime Trees

The restoration work which sough to restore the park to its original state, had required the removal of some trees to open up the vistas and the replacement of others trees, in particular those located along the main drive. 

 

The specimen Lime Trees which had been planted had been adversely affected by the weather resulting in irreparable damage.  The trees were to be replaced although additional drainage works would be required to mitigate against the same problem.  Members requested that the removal works be expedited. 

 

Retaining Wall

Structural problems with the retaining wall had been identified subsequent to the HLF submission. Funding was being sought to allow remedial works to be carried out. 

 

East/West Lodge

Restoration works would be required for both the East and West Lodge to include rewiring and redecoration and negotiations with regards to the tenancy of West Lodge were progressing well.   

 

Pathways

The pathways were to be repaired/edged and reinstated along the original route once the heavy plant work had been completed.                          

 

Bandstand/Shelters

The canopy of trees surrounding the Bandstand had been pruned.  The shelter currently located in the Children’s playground was considered to be worthy of refurbishment and would be relocated to a new location once works had been completed.    

 

Play Equipment

A Member had, during his mayoral year raised funds specifically for the purchase of play equipment for the disabled.  Some monies remained to be spent and he suggested that, if the funds could be used for this purpose, match funding could then be sought from WREN. 

 

The Landscape Architect was thanked for his comprehensive update.             

   


19.       FINANCIAL OUT-TURN REPORT FOR 2006/2007     

 

The Committee received the report of the Executive Director, Treasury and Corporate Support which outlined financial outturn for 2006/2007 compared with revised budgets.  The Assistant Director Accountancy and Audit reported on the main variances under the planning, local economy and environment portfolios.             

           


 

20.       FINANCIAL MONITORING REPORT 2007/2008

 

The Committee received the report of the Executive Director, Treasury and Corporate Support which provided information in relation to actual expenditure and income in the current financial year for the period 1 April to 30 June 2007, compared with profiled budgets. 

 

The Assistant Director drew Members’ attention to paragraph 3.2 of the report which listed areas which would be monitored during the year.  


21.       PERFORMANCE MONITORING

 

The report of the Policy and Performance Officer provided out-turn performance information against BVPIs and Local PIs for the period 1 April to 30 June 2007.  Members commented on the following -    

 

LP601b – Number of jobs created assisted by the Council’s role in Economic Development (Net of job losses)

 

The target for this indicator was a net gain of 500 jobs by March 2008, a figure which had been exceeded in previous years.  The Economic Development and Estates Manager cautioned that meeting the target this year would be a challenge given the current economic climate and the fact that the majority of available employment land had now been sold.  Land availability would also influence the Council’s capacity to retain major employers within the town as companies sought to expand their businesses or build new facilities to their own specification.         

 

The Chief Executive referred the Committee to its earlier decision (17.1) in relation to the Local Development Framework, stating that the issue of identifying employment land could be addressed as part of the process. 

 

A Member spoken of a business which had transferred its business from Crewe with the loss of 200 jobs.  He queried the level of assistance which had been offered by the Council and whether such assistance had come too late to prevent the relocation taking place. 

 

(Note: At this point in the meeting, Councillor Roberts declared a personal interest in this item as he was employed by one of the businesses under discussion.)

 

   

 

In response, the Economic Development and Estates Manager confirmed that, if the Council became aware of an imminent move, officers would approach the business to offer advice and assistance but in some cases notification came too late.  The authority worked closely with partners such as the Chamber of Commerce and Job Centre Plus to try and pre-empt such situations but in any event, relevant information was gathered and analysed to inform future actions. 

 

(Note: In accordance with Procedure Rule 26(2), Councillor Hogben spoke on this item with the permission of the Committee.)

 


22.      CONSULTATION – PUBLIC RIGHTS OF WAY

 

The Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (DEFRA) had published a consultation document in May 2007 seeking views on a proposed approach to new statutory rights of application and appeal in connection with making changes to the public rights of way network, as introduced by the Countryside and Rights of Way Act 2000.  To assist Members, an executive summary had been drawn from the paper and was tabled at the meeting, listing the 35 questions to which DEFRA was seeking a response.                 

 

A Member, whom had considered the document in some detail, provided the Committee with her own synopsis of the proposals, stating that the paper had sought to reach a balance between the right to roam and the protection of land owner rights.  Many of the suggestions were, in her view common sense and she generally supported the document. 

 

Given that the closing date for responses was 31 August 2007 and in light of the number of questions to be considered, the Committee AGREED that any comments on the proposals should be forwarded to the relevant officers to inform the Council’s response.        


23.      TOWN CENTRE UPDATE

 

This subject had been included on the agenda as a standing item at the request of the Chairman.  The Chief Executive provided a brief progress report on town centre matters covering the Development Agreement, Compulsory Purchase Order and Section 106 Agreement associated with the Modus development, new office accommodation, provision of CCTV and the development of Market Square.


24.      VACANCY PANEL DECISIONS 

 

The Committee received the report of the Human Resources Manager and noted the decisions of the Vacancy Panel made between 26 June and 23 July 2007.        


25.      WORK PROGRAMME 2007   

 

25.1    Task Group Update   

 

Members had previously agreed that, where possible, formal reports would be submitted for information to the Committee on the work of the Task Groups.  On this occasion only the Affordable Housing Task Group had submitted such a report. 

 

25.1.1            Affordable Housing

 

From its inception in November 2006, the Task Group had undertaken work on a number of issues in relation to affordable housing; the findings from which had helped inform the ‘Provision of Affordable Housing’ report considered and approved by the Board at its meeting on 31 May 2007.  It was the view of the Head of Housing therefore, that the remit set for the Group had been achieved and unless the Committee wished to nominate other areas for consideration, its work had concluded.   

 

Whilst there was agreement that the remit of the Group had been met, Members considered that the next stage would be to monitor the progress of the policies introduced as a result of the report and requested that half yearly reports be provided to the Committee.    

 

25.2    Climate Change Task Group 

 

Two members of Local Economy & Environment had been appointed to sit on the Climate Change Task Group (Councillors Cartlidge and Healey) and, following agreement of the group’s terms of reference, an invitation had been extended to the Community and Organisation Scrutiny Committees to appoint two from amongst its membership to the Group. 

 

It was reported that Councillor Griffiths had been appointed from Community Scrutiny Committee but that Organisation Scrutiny Committee had declined the invitation.              


 

26.      DATE OF NEXT MEETING

 

11 September 2007

 


 

 

…………………….  Chair