PERFORMANCE
AND OVERVIEW COMMITTEE
COMMUNITY
RECORD OF MEETING
HELD ON 30TH MAY 2007
Present:
Councillor J Lewis; Chair
Councillors D N Bebbington, J D Bratherton, D
H D Charlesworth, S Conquest, C Goff,
M Grant, G Griffiths, R Jones, M A Martin and
S J S Mottram
In Attendance:
Lisa
Carr
Policy and Performance Officer
Annette
Potts
Head of Environmental Health (for Record No. 5.1 only)
Also in Attendance:
Alan
White
Chair – Mid-Cheshire Hospitals Trust
Paul
Buckley Deputy
Director of Operations – Mid-Cheshire Hospitals Trust
Non-Committee Members in attendance:
(for whole or part of the meeting)
Councillor R
Westwood Portfolio Holder for
Neighbourhoods
Councillor S W Hogben
1
DECLARATIONS OF INTEREST
No Member made any declaration of
interest in any item of business on the agenda at this point in the
meeting.
2
RECORD OF MEETING
AGREED: That the Record of the
Meeting held on 4th April 2007 be approved as
correct.
3
WHIPPING DECLARATIONS
In accordance with Paragraph 18 of the
Performance and Overview Procedure Rules, Members were invited to
declare in respect of items where the whip had been applied.
No such declarations were made.
4
MID-CHESHIRE HOSPITALS TRUST – FOUNDATION TRUST
Alan White and Paul Buckley, from Mid-Cheshire
Hospitals Trust were in attendance for this item and made a
presentation on the Trust’s proposed application for Foundation
status.
The presentation covered the following areas
–
Ø Consultation
Ø Strategic direction for
MCHT
Ø Outline of a Foundation Trust
(a local hospital which was fully integrated with the NHS but
accountable to local people)
Ø Differences between
Foundation and Trust status
Ø Governance arrangements
Ø
Members: Three classes proposed –
Public (for residents of the three boroughs)
Patients and carers
Staff and volunteers
Ø Role of
Members
Ø Role of
Governors
Ø Board of Governors (30
comprising 9 public constituency, 6 patient and carers, 7 staff and
volunteers and 8 appointed by the Trust’s partners)
Ø Board of
Directors
Ø Key
“Milestones”
-
23rd April 2007
Commencement of
12-week consultation
- June-July
2007 Historic
due diligence
- July
2007 Deadline
for submission of Foundation Trust
Application
- August
2007
Review by Monitor
- October
2007
Set up “shadow” Foundation Trust
- November
2007 Monitor
Board interviews to Trust Board of
Directors
- December
2007 Decision on
application
- January
2008 Launch
of NHS Foundation Trust
Members of the Committee were able to ask
questions by way of clarification and these were responded to by Mr
White and Mr Buckley, as appropriate, following which, they were
both thanked for their presentation and withdrew from the
meeting.
5
BOARD BUSINESS
5.1
Board Meeting – 31st May 2007
The Committee was invited to comment on
reports to be considered by the Board on 31st May
2007.
Smoke-Free Legislation
(Report 9)
Annette Potts (Head of Environmental Health)
was in attendance for discussion of this item.
AGREED: That the recommendation
to Council be supported.
(Note: In accordance with Procedure
Rule No. 18(2) Councillor Griffiths requested that his abstention
from voting on this item be recorded.)
Designated Public Places
Order (DPPOs) (“Alcohol Exclusion Zones”) (Report
5)
Members discussed the report of the Portfolio
Holder for Safer Communities which proposed the referral to Full
Council of evidence presented in respect of the extent of any
Designation Orders under the provisions of the Criminal Justice and
Police Act 2001.
On 1st November 2006 Full Council
had approved the procedural framework for the making of Designated
Public Place Orders (DPPO) and had delegated the power to make such
Orders to the Licensing & Regulatory Committee. Following
a request from the Police to institute a wider “ban” than initially
identified, the issue was being reconsidered and the report
proposed a recommendation to Full Council.
Comments were made as follows, but were not,
necessarily, the views of the whole Committee -
-- There was an unrealistic
expectation about DPPOs, many people believing that they
constituted a ban on drinking alcohol in specific areas, whereas
the offence was to continue to drink alcohol after being requested
by a Police Officer to cease drinking or surrender that
alcohol.
-- The original areas which had
been identified in November 2006 were satisfactory for the purposes
of this legislation and should have been implemented.
-- A ward-wide “ban” was likely
to be as ineffective as a “blanket ban”. Whilst there were
pockets of anti-social drinking in certain wards, it would be
unreasonable to designate a whole ward for such Orders.
-- The Orders could only operate
effectively if the Police were able to enforce them and the more
extensive the areas, the less likely they would be able to be
enforced.
AGREED: That the following
be submitted to the Board as the Committee’s comments on the report
-
(a) That the Board be
urged to refer the matter to Full Council;
(b) That the Board
request the views of the Police on the effectiveness of DPPOs;
and
(c) That the Police
be asked to identify the areas which they would be willing to
enforce.
(Note: In accordance with Procedure Rule
No. 26(2) Councillors R Westwood and S W Hogben spoke on this item
with the permission of the Committee.)
Best Value Performance
Indicators – Out-turn 2006/2007 (Report 8)
The Committee supported the proposals, and
also discussed the indicators which fell within its remit.
The Policy and Performance Officer reported on
an announcement by the Department for Communities and Local
Government (DCLG) that nine national BVPIs had been deleted, with
effect from 1st April 2007, on the basis that they no
longer provided useful information, or in response to recent
reports released from the “Lifting the Burdens Task Force”
commissioned by Ruth Kelly, Secretary of State for
Communities. Those deleted were noted –
|
BV 17b
|
Percentage of economically active population
from ethnic minority communities
|
|
BV 183 (a)
|
Length of stay in temporary accommodation
|
|
BV 203
|
Change in number of families in temporary
accommodation
|
|
BV 214
|
Repeat homelessness
|
|
BV 219 (a) and (c)
|
Total number of conservation areas and
percentage of conservation area plans published
|
|
BV 76a
|
The number of housing benefit claimants in the
local authority visited per 100,000 caseload
|
|
BV 200 (c)
|
Plan making
|
Some concern was expressed at the deletion of
these BVPIs. The Committee was informed that those considered to be
of importance could be retained as local performance
indicators.
The Policy and Performance Officer undertook
to provide information to the next meeting of the Committee in
respect of the three housing indicators which had been
deleted. She also undertook to provide information for the
previous 3-years on the community safety indicators (BVPIs 126 and
128a).
5.2 Exclusion of Press
and Public
RESOLVED: That the press and
public be excluded from the meeting during consideration of the
following item pursuant to Section 100(A) (4) of the Local
Government Act 1972 on the grounds that it involved the likely
disclosure of exempt information as defined in Paragraph 3 of Part
1 of Schedule 12A (as amended) of the Act.
5.3 Request to Waive
Regulations as to Contracts – Homelessness
Contract (Paragraph 3)
(Note: At this point in the meeting,
Councillor R Westwood declared a personal and prejudicial interest
in the item, on the basis that he was a Member of the Wulvern
Housing Board, and withdrew from the meeting.)
The Committee accepted the recommendation in
the report.
5.4 Re-admittance of
Press and Public
RESOLVED: That the
press and public be re-admitted to the meeting.
5.5 Wulvern Housing –
Governance Review (Report 12)
(Note: Councillor R Westwood
re-joined the meeting during discussion of this item.)
The Housing Corporation had recommended that
Wulvern Housing reduce its Board from 15 to 12 members and the
Borough Council was being consulted on the proposal. Members
of the Committee objected to the proposed reduction in
representation, and AGREED that the following
comments be submitted to the Board.
(a) That
the Board be urged to support retention of the current balance of
equal representation of local authority, tenant and independent
Members on the Wulvern Board; and
(b) That the
Committee did not support the principle of membership of the
Wulvern Board being limited to Members of this Council’s Board.
(Note: In accordance with Procedure
Rule No. 26(2), Councillors S W Hogben and R Westwood spoke on this
item with the permission of the Committee.)
5.6 Provisional List of
Board Items
The Committee noted the Board’s Forward Plan
for June, July and September 2007.
5.7 Responses/Referrals
from the Board or Council
It was noted that there were no responses or
referrals from the Board or Council on this occasion.
6
WORK PROGRAMME
The Committee was invited to review its work
programme. The following two topics had been agreed for
review during 2007/2008.
6.1
Cheshire County Council – Social Care
Councillor Conquest had requested this
review, which had been supported by the Committee; he
reiterated that he would like it to be conducted by way of
witness-evidence.
He undertook to issue an invitation to a
representative of Cheshire Carers Trust to attend the next
meeting. It was agreed that the appropriate Cheshire County
Council Officer be invited to attend also, to offer the County
Council’s perspective on the non-residential charging policy.
AGREED:
(a) That this
review be deferred to the next meeting;
(b) That a
representative from Cheshire Carers Trust, and an Officer from
Cheshire County Council, be invited to attend the
meeting.
6.2 Police
Service Review
In the absence of the Assistant Chief
Executive, it was AGREED that this item be
deferred to the next meeting. Comment was made that it may be
an appropriate topic for review by a small working group which
could meet on a quarterly basis with an appropriate Senior Police
Officer.
6.3 Other
Potential Reviews
The Committee considered the A-Z of
Portfolios and Performance and Overview Responsibilities for
2007/2008 and was invited to consider other topics for
review. A copy of a Scrutiny Form was attached and Members
were reminded that this should be completed by any Member
requesting a review and should define the scope of it, identify
perceived reasons for the review, the way in which should be
conducted, together with the intended outcome.
Councillor Griffiths suggested
Neighbourhood renewal from the perspective of
physical provision in an area, and how the Borough Council ensured
that older parts of specific areas were retained as viable parts of
the appropriate community. Councillor Griffiths
agreed to complete a scrutiny form for submission to the next
meeting, for consideration.
The following were also suggested –
Grants
Allocation: The way in
which grants were allocated and
whether
there was any imbalance in their
distribution.
Leisure Charge
Increases:
The impact on take-up of leisure facilities.
7 NEXT
MEETING
7.1
Date: 18th July 2007
7.2 Agenda items in
addition to those agreed above –
(a) Annual report
on air quality monitoring
(b) Educational
attainment
……….……………….………….
Chair