Your Council!Your Council

 

 

                                    LICENSING AND REGULATORY SUB-COMMITTEE NO. 7

18TH DECEMBER 2007

 

Present:

 

Councillor W S Davies: Chair

Councillors A Crawford, B H Dykes, J Lewis, R Stafford and L T Wood

 

In attendance:

 

Mr T O’Donnell                      Minute No. 50 only

Mr R Badman                        Hibbert Durrad Moxom LLP (Representing Mr O’Donnell)

Mr A Gajoum                         Minute No. 51 only

Mr C Drew                             Brown and Corbishley (Representing Mr Gajoum)

Mr C M Jones                        Democratic Services Officer

Mr A C Lee                            Legal Adviser

 


48        DECLARATIONS OF INTEREST

 

No Member made any declaration of interest in respect of any item of business on the agenda.


49        MINUTES

 

RESOLVED:  That the minutes of the meeting of the Sub-Committee held on 3rd July 2007 be approved as a correct record.


50        CONVICTION OF THE HOLDER OF A HACKNEY CARRIAGE AND PRIVATE HIRE LICENCE

 

(Note: Mr Gajoum and Mr Drew joined the meeting at this point in the proceedings and were in attendance throughout discussion of this item, except where indicated.)

Following a covert operation in December 2006, Ahmed Gajoum, who had held a licence to drive Hackney Carriage and private hire vehicles since June 2006 had been convicted of an offence of plying for hire illegally and an offence of driving without motor insurance. 

On 16th December 2006 undercover Officers of the Council and Police approached Mr Gajoum who was the driver of a private hire vehicle and was stopped outside The Earl Public House on Nantwich Road, Crewe.  The Officers asked Mr Gajoum to take them to Nantwich.  Mr Gajoum enquired if they had ordered the car and then contacted his radio operator, following which he agreed to the request and took them to Nantwich.

Mr Gajoum pleaded not guilty to both offences, but was convicted.  He appealed against the convictions to Chester Crown Court on 7th November 2007.  The appeal against his conviction for driving without insurance was upheld. On the day of the hearing, he withdrew his appeal against conviction for the plying for hire offence.  He was fined £75 with costs of £350.

The Sub-Committee was asked to determine what course of action to take in respect of the entitlement of the licence-holder to continue to hold his licences.

 

On behalf of Mr Gajoum, Mr Drew presented his case, offering mitigation on the basis that –

 

(a)    English was Mr Gajoum’s second language;

(b)    Mr Gajoum had radioed his company to seek permission before accepting the fare;

(c)    He had allegedly been told by his employer that such a practice was in order;

(d)    He was relatively new to the job;

(e)    He normally drove a Hackney Carriage;

(f)     There was no history of any complaints having previously been made against Mr Gajoum. 

 

Mr Drew also made reference to Mr Gajoum’s financial circumstances.

Mr Gajoum was questioned by Sub-Committee Members by way of clarification.

Mr Gajoum and Mr Drew withdrew from the meeting whilst the Sub-Committee reached its decision. The Committee Officer and the Legal Adviser remained in the meeting.

Following the Sub-Committee’s determination, Mr Gajoum and Mr Drew rejoined the meeting to be informed of the decision.

 

 

RESOLVED: 

 

That Ahmed Gajoum’s licence to drive Hackney Carriage and private hire vehicles be suspended for one month.

 

Mr Gajoum was advised of his right to appeal to the Magistrates Court.

 

The Sub-Committee took into account –

 

(a)    The Council’s Statement of Policy about Relevant Convictions, in particular, Paragraph 6 which related to the effect of convictions.

 

(b)    The report of the Executive Director (Environment and Development)

 

(c)    Mr Drew’s letter on behalf of Mr Gajoum, together with oral evidence provided at the meeting.

 

(d)    The proper operation of the respective private hire and Hackney Carriage licensing functions.

 

(e)    The safety of the travelling public.

 

(Note:  Mr Gajoum and Mr Drew withdrew from the meeting at this point in the proceedings.)

 


 

51        CONVICTION OF THE HOLDER OF A HACKNEY CARRIAGE AND PRIVATE HIRE LICENCE

 

(Note:  Mr O’Donnell and Mr Badman joined the meeting at this point in the proceedings and were in attendance throughout discussion of this item, except where indicated.)

Following a covert operation in December 2006, Thomas O’Donnell, who had held a licence to drive Hackney Carriage and private hire vehicles since July 2002 had been convicted of an offence of plying for hire illegally and an offence of driving without motor insurance. 

On 9th December 2006 undercover Officers of the Council and Police approached Mr O’Donnell who was the driver of a private hire vehicle stopped in Oatmarket, Nantwich.  The Officers asked to be taken to Crewe Railway Station.  Mr O’Donnell agreed and took them to the station.

The Council instigated proceedings in respect of the offence on 9th December 2006, but took no action in respect of a similar alleged offence on 16th December 2006, details of which had been provided in the report submitted.

Mr O’Donnell had pleaded guilty to the offence at South Cheshire Magistrates Court on 24th September 2007. He was fined £250 for illegally plying for hire; £250 for having no insurance; his licence was endorsed with 6 penalty points and he was ordered to pay £45 costs.  Mr O’Donnell already had 9 points on his driving licence and the conviction for no insurance now gave him a total of 15 points. Under the “totting up” provisions, a driver was automatically disqualified when he accumulated 12 or more points;  however, the Magistrates had been satisfied that he would suffer exceptional financial hardship if he had been disqualified and therefore allowed him to retain his licence.

The Sub-Committee was asked to determine what course of action to take in respect of the entitlement of the licence-holder to continue to hold his licences.

On behalf of Mr O’Donnell, Mr Badman presented his case principally on the basis that the financial penalties imposed by the court were sufficient punishment and that the suspension or revocation of his licences would be detrimental to his ability to maintain a livelihood.  He was 61 years of age and had no other reasonable prospect of employment.  Mr O’Donnell also spoke in support of his case and made reference to his personal circumstances which had prevailed around the time of the incident.

Mr O’Donnell was questioned by Sub-Committee Members by way of clarification.

Mr O’Donnell and Mr Badman withdrew from the meeting whilst the Sub-Committee reached its decision.  The Committee Officer and the Legal Adviser remained in the meeting.

Following the Sub-Committee’s determination, Mr O’Donnell and Mr Badman rejoined the meeting to be informed of the decision.

 

 

RESOLVED: 

 

That Thomas O’Donnell’s licence to drive Hackney Carriage and private hire vehicles be suspended for three months.

 

Mr O’Donnell was advised of his right to appeal to the Magistrates Court.

 

The Sub-Committee took into account –

 

(a)               The Council’s Statement of Policy about Relevant Convictions, in particular, Paragraphs 6  and 13;  Paragraph 6 related to the effect of convictions and Paragraph 13 related to motoring convictions where licence-holders/applicants had 12 or more penalty points endorsed on their licence but who had not been disqualified under the “totting up” procedure..

 

(b)         The report of the Executive Director (Environment and Development)

 

(c)         Mr Badman’s letter on behalf of Mr O’Donnell, together with oral evidence provided at the meeting.

 

(d)         The proper operation of the respective private hire and Hackney Carriage licensing functions.

 

(e)         The safety of the travelling public.

 


 

 

 

………………………………Chair