STANDARDS
COMMITTEE
14TH
NOVEMBER 2006
Present:
Mr N Briers (Independent non-Council Member);
Chair
Councillors D J Cannon, P A Hallett and L T
Wood
Independent (non-Council)
Members:
Mr R Pomlett and Mr J Ross
Parish Representative:
Mr D Forrest
Officers in attendance:
Mr C Henshall
Acting Monitoring Officer
Miss D Moulson
Democratic Services Officer
Apologies: Councillors
R Cartlidge and J Hammond
26. CHAIRMAN’S
WELCOME
The Chairman welcomed Mr Roger Pomlett,
appointed by Council on 1st November 2006 as the third
Independent non-Council Member to the Standards
Committee.
27. DECLARATIONS OF
INTEREST
No Member made any declaration of interest in
respect of any item of business on the agenda.
28. RECORDS OF
MEETINGS
AGREED: That the records of the
meetings held on 3rd October 2006 and 23rd
October 2006 be approved as correct.
29. REVISIONS TO THE
CODE OF CONDUCT
The Committee had been provided with an
extract from a Standards Board publication ‘Town and Parish
Standard No.8’, which outlined key changes proposed to the current
model Code of Conduct. It was anticipated that appropriate
legislation would be published in time to enable authorities to
adopt the changes proposed prior to May 2007 elections.
The Committee requested that all Members of
Council be made aware of the proposed amendments upon receipt of
the relevant documentation by the
authority.
30. ETHICS AND
STANDARDS PRESENTATIONS
This item had been included on the agenda as
no presentation relating to ethics and standards had yet been made
to Borough Councillors during the Municipal Year. In light of
changes proposed to the Code of Conduct, the Committee agreed to
defer consideration of the matter to a future
meeting.
31. COMPLEMENTS,
COMMENTS AND COMPLAINTS (CCC) SCHEME
31.1
Presentation
The Committee received a presentation on the
report of the Principal Policy Officer, tabled at the meeting,
which outlined communications received by the Council for the
period September – October 2006.
31.2 Operation of
the CCC Scheme
Concerns relating to the operation of the
Complements, Comments and Complaints Scheme had been expressed by
the Committee at previous meetings. It was also reported that
the process by which the scheme was operated had impacted on the
corresponding performance indicator which was currently below
target. To enable a cross-cutting review to take place, the
Committee was invited to identify its
concerns.
In making their comments, Members stated that
whilst they did not wish to impose any further bureaucracy on the
scheme, it was important to ensure that the mechanisms driving the
procedure were sound and easy to understand.
|
Topic
|
Concern
|
|
Comments/Complaints
|
Classification between comments and complaints
needed to be clearer and applied consistently
|
|
Replies
|
A reply should be issued in all cases, not
just to complainants
|
|
Response times
|
Response times should be monitored and
recorded
|
|
Complaints
|
Feasibility of recording complaints made
directly to officers (which were not currently part of the scheme)
should be investigated
|
|
Awareness of the Scheme
|
It was perceived that was a lack of awareness
of the scheme amongst the public
|
|
Communication
|
Members considered that there was a lack of
communication amongst officers of the Council as to how the scheme
should operate
|
At the conclusion of the discussion, the
Chairman stated that the Committee’s concerns would be forwarded to
the Principal Policy Officer to inform the review taking
place.
32. HEARINGS PROCEDURE
- REVIEW
On the one occasion the Committee had carried
out a hearing into an alleged breach of Conduct by a Member of the
Borough Council, the Committee had followed the model procedure as
set down by the Standards Board for England.
Two years had passed since the hearing and the
Committee had requested that it be reminded of the procedure.
Members also considered that colleagues and officers should be made
aware of the procedure in the event that an allegation was required
to be determined by the
Committee.
The model procedure, as adopted, was appended
to the agenda for information. A Member commented that,
whilst the procedure had worked well it was difficult to
follow. It was suggested that a flow chart, together with a
synopsis of the procedure be drawn up and submitted to the next
meeting for
consideration.
33. DATE OF NEXT
MEETING
30th January 2007
.........…………………….
Chair