Your Council!Your Council
STATEMENT OF DECISION MADE AT A SPECIAL MEETING OF THE BOARD
HELD ON 5TH JUNE 2006
 
PRESENT:
 
Councillor Brian Silvester                 (Leader of the Council in the Chair)
Councillor Rachel Bailey                  (Portfolio Holder for Planning)
Councillor David Brickhill                 (Portfolio Holder for Economic Development)
Councillor John Dwyer                      (Portfolio Holder for Safer Communities)
Councillor Graham Fenton               (Portfolio Holder for Finance)
Councillor John Hammond               (Portfolio Holder for the Local Environment)
Councillor John Hatfield                   (Portfolio Holder for Human Resources)
Councillor Bill McGinnis                   (Portfolio Holder for Leisure)
Councillor Margaret Simon              (Portfolio Holder for Customers)
Councillor Ray Westwood                (Portfolio Holder for Neighbourhoods)
 
NON-BOARD MEMBERS IN ATTENDANCE:
 
Councillors T E Ankers, W T Beard, J A Beech, J D Bratherton, P K Butterill,
M Campbell, R Cartlidge, G Griffiths, S W Hogben, M R Jones,  S Roberts and
M J Weatherill
 
OFFICERS IN ATTENDANCE:
 
Paul Ancell                 (Executive Director, Environment & Development)
Jenny Cross               (Executive Director, Treasury and Corporate Support)
Bill Howie                   (Democratic Services Manager)
Carol Jones                 (Democratic Services Officer)
Alan Warburton            (Assistant Chief Executive, Democratic Services and Human Resources)
Alan Wenham             (Chief Executive)
 
 
NOTE: The following Decision should be read in conjunction with the corresponding report which accompanied the Board Agenda issued on 25th May 2006 and Officer's Report issued on 31st May 2006.  The agenda and report is available on the Council's Internet Website. www.crewe-nantwich.gov.uk
 
1.         CHAIRMAN'S REMARKS
 
The Chairman welcomed Members to the first meeting of the Board following the elections on 4th May 2006.  On behalf of the Board, he paid tribute to the previous Board for its contribution to the work of the Authority.
 
2.         DECLARATIONS OF INTEREST
 
            No Member made any declaration of interest in any item of business on the    agenda.
 
3.         MUNICIPAL SQUARE, CREWE SUSPENSION OF CERTAIN WORKS
 
            The Board considered the report of Councillor Brian Silvester, Leader of the Council, together with an Officer's Report on the technical and financial implications in respect of the suspension of certain works on the square known as "Municipal Square".
 
            The Board intended to undertake a further consultation on the siting of the War Memorial in Crewe.  It was considered inappropriate to complete the approved scheme for "Municipal Square" until that consultation process had been completed. 
 
DECISION:
 
(A)       That Officers be instructed to progress the scheme for "Municipal Square" as approved, except that no aspect of the scheme which was connected with the memorial function be installed until further notice. (For the avoidance of doubt, memorial items included the Britannia statue, the plinth, any plaques or commemorative panels or stones, any notices or informative boards, or any item in the floorscape);
 
(B)             That Officers be instructed to secure urgent modifications to the scheme detail so that practical completion can take place in the absence of items specified in (A) above;
 
(C)             That any current or future additional costs arising as a result of these instructions be contained within the £3m capital provision for the renovation of the squares in Crewe, and to the extent that any of these costs were deemed to be abortive, the Board acknowledges that there will be a charge to the Revenue Account to be met from virement, or by an additional budgetary allocation from revenue reserves;   and
 
(D)             That a further report on costs, including any abortive costs, be submitted to a future Board meeting.
 
Alternative Option:
 
            To complete the "Municipal Square" scheme as originally planned and then re-consult the public.
 
Reasons for the Decision:
 
(a)           The previous consultation was inadequate;
 
(b)           The consultation did not comply with the requirements of the Council's Consultation Strategy; and
 
(c)            There had been widespread public concern about the proposed re-siting of the war memorial, as evidenced by the submission of a petition containing 10,000 names.
 
 
 
................................................................Signed