PERFORMANCE AND OVERVIEW
COMMITTEE
LOCAL ECONOMY &
ENVIRONMENT
RECORD OF MEETING HELD ON
25TH JULY 2006
Present:
Councillor S Roberts (Chair); Councillors P K Butterill, R
Cartlidge, P A Hallett, M A Hollins, A C Johnson, A Moran, S J S
Mottram and L T Wood
In Attendance:
Councillor D
Brickhill
Portfolio Holder for Economic
Development
Councillor J Hammond
Portfolio Holder for Local Environment
Officers in attendance (for whole or
part):
P
Ancell
Executive Director, Environment and Development
P
Burns
Business Development Manager, Direct
Services
B
Dyson
Dunlop Hayward (for item 26)
C Henshall
Borough Solicitor (for item 26)
D Moulson
Democratic Services Officer
S
Mantle
Principal Accountant, Treasury and Corporate
Support
A Wenham Chief
Executive
Apologies:
Councillors D N Bebbington, A Crawford and R
Stafford
15.
DECLARATIONS OF INTEREST
No Member declared any personal or prejudicial interest in
respect of any item of business on the
agenda.
16.
RECORDS OF MEETINGS
AGREED: That the records of the meetings held on
13th June 2006 and 15th June 2006 be approved
as correct.
17.
WHIPPING DECLARATIONS
In accordance with Paragraph 18 of the Performance and
Overview Procedure Rules, Members were invited to declare in
respect of items where the whip had been
applied. No such declarations were
made.
18.
"CALL IN" OF BOARD DECISION NO. 3 (15TH JUNE 2006)
RESPONSE FROM COUNCIL/BOARD
The Committee considered Board Decision No. 3 (Municipal
Square, Crewe - Suspension of Certain Works) on 15th
July 2006 and reached the conclusion that valid grounds had been
established to refer the decision to Council for review on the
grounds that it (the decision) was "of high local significance and
of public interest".
At the Council meeting held on 28th June 2006 the
following motion was carried:
"That this Council
a)
recognises the Board's commitment to
re-consultation;
b)
wishes to minimise the impact of possible abortive and/or
additional
costs on the Council Tax payer;
c)
views it as imperative that the Crewe War Memorial is located
in an
appropriate setting for November's events (Armistice Day
and Remembrance Sunday); and
therefore urges the Board to allow works on the Municipal
Square to proceed to completion without further delay, and without
prejudice to the outcome of public
re-consultation".
Members noted that the Board was due to reconsider the
recommendations of both the P & O Committee and Council at its
meeting on 27th July 2006.
19.
BOARD REPORTS
The Committee discussed the following report which would be
considered by the Board at its meeting on 27th July 2006
-
Stapeley Water Gardens Development
Brief
The draft development brief for Stapeley Water Gardens had
been published for the purpose of consultation on 16th
February 2006. The site had been allocated as a
mixed use regeneration area encompassing the Water Gardens, B1
employment land and residential development. The
report outlined the comments received and recommended amendments to
the brief.
Access for the site was proposed to be taken from both Peter
de Stapleigh Way (for the Water Gardens and the employment site)
and from London Road (for the residential
development). At the Board briefing, concern was
raised about this arrangement and an approach had been made to the
Highway Authority to establish whether there were other viable
options for access routes. It was confirmed that
a response would be provided at the Board
meeting.
COMMENT TO THE BOARD:
The Committee expressed its concern
regarding the proposed access for the residential element of the
development from London Road and supported the Board's request to
investigate alternative accesses with the Highways
Authority.
20.
FORWARD PLAN OF BOARD
DECISIONS
The Committee received the Board's Forward Plan for 7
September, 19 October, 9 November and 30 November
2006.
21.
LOCAL ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT - UPDATE
The Chief Executive gave a short presentation to the Committee
which illustrated the level of economic growth experienced by the
Borough during a three year period. The
presentation covered -
§
Employment growth
§
Hotel and Leisure growth
§
Retail growth
§
Hard and soft infrastructure
§
Housing growth
§
Regeneration areas
§
Future development hotspots
§
The role of the business community
§
Future developments to
2009
The Committee made reference to a number of developments
taking place within the rural areas and commented on the success of
several festivals held throughout the year in the
Borough. The contribution of the community and
various agencies through partnership working was
acknowledged.
22.
FINANCIAL OUTTURN 2005/2006
The Committee received the report of the Executive Director,
Treasury and Corporate Support which outlined the financial outturn
for 2005/2006 compared with revised budgets. The
Principal Accountant reported on the main
variances.
23.
BUDGET MONITORING 2006/2007 (1ST APRIL TO
30TH JUNE)
The Committee received the report of the Executive Director,
Treasury and Corporate Support which provided information in
relation to actual expenditure and income in the current financial
year for the period 1st April to 30th June,
compared with profiled budgets.
24.
WORK PROGRAMME TASK GROUP
UPDATE
Four Task Groups had been appointed by the Committee at its
previous meeting: Affordable Housing, Town Centre and Retail
Economy, Town Centre's Car Parks and Waste
Management. Of these, only the Town Centre and
Retail Economy Task Group had met although it was reported that the
Affordable Housing Task Group was due to meet on 1st
August.
The Executive Director, Environment and Development reported
to the Committee that the Town Centre and Retail Economy Task Group
had met to consider the issue of public art.
Representatives from Bolton Metropolitan Borough Council had given
a presentation to Members and officers on the procedures and
policies Bolton had adopted in order to help facilitate the
provision of public art within the town. Key to
its success had been its commitment to public art by way of
§
A public art strategy
§
The involvement of the community
§
The adoption of a planning policy which sought to seek 1%
contribution towards public art on developments over an agreed
threshold
§
Allocation of 1% of its capital programme for public
art
Whilst some of the procedures were considered unsuitable for
Crewe and Nantwich, valuable information had been obtained from
Bolton's approach. It was noted that a Public
Art Strategy was currently being prepared for the Council by North
West Arts Council, which would be presented to the Board later in
the year before being published for
consultation.
25.
EXCLUSION OF PRESS AND PUBLIC
AGREED: That the press and
public be excluded from the meeting during consideration of the
remaining item on the agenda pursuant to Section 100(A) (4) of the
Local Government Act 1972 on the grounds that it involves the
likely disclosure of exempt information as defined in Paragraph 3
of Part 1 of Schedule 12A (as amended) of the
Act.
26.
CREWE TOWN CENTRE DEVELOPMENT
(Notes: 1. Councillors Bailey, Grant, Griffiths and
Hogben joined the meeting for this item. 2.
During the discussion, Councillors Brickhill and Moran declared
personal interests in the development agreement by virtue of their
membership of Cheshire County
Council.)
Negotiations between Crewe and Nantwich Borough Council and
Modus had progressed sufficiently for the Council to consider the
Heads of Terms of a Development Agreement for Crewe Town Centre
redevelopment. The report was to be submitted to
the Board at its meeting on 27th July prior to
consideration by full Council on 2nd August 2006.
To provide Councillors with the opportunity to familiarise
themselves with the content of the document before Council, an
invitation to attend the meeting had been issued to all elected
members. The Executive Director, Environment and
Development and Mr Dyson representing Dunlop Heyward, the Council's
external advisors addressed the meeting and provided those present
with an overview of the Heads of
Terms.
Members raised a number of points for clarification which were
responded to by the Executive Director and Mr
Dyson. At the conclusion of the item, Mr Dyson
was thanked by the Chairman for his
presentation.
.........................
Chair