Your Council!Your Council

PERFORMANCE AND OVERVIEW COMMITTEE

LOCAL ECONOMY & ENVIRONMENT

RECORD OF MEETING HELD ON 28TH NOVEMBER 2006      

 

Present: 

Councillor S Roberts, (Chair); Councillors D N Bebbington, P K Butterill, A Crawford, M A Hollins, A C Johnson, A Moran and L T Wood    

Officers in Attendance (for whole or part):       

P Ancell           Chief Executive

P Burns            Business Development Manager (Direct Services)

P Goodwin       Assistant Director (Accountancy & Audit)

V Jeffrey           Head of Housing

D Moulson       Democratic Services Officer 

In Attendance:

Councillor J Hammond, Portfolio Holder for the Local Environment and Councillor S W Hogben  

Apologies:      Councillors R Cartlidge, P A Hallett and S J S Mottram      

       

39.         DECLARATIONS OF INTEREST

No Member declared any personal or prejudicial interest in respect of any item of business on the agenda.    

40.         RECORD OF MEETING

AGREED: That the record of the meeting held on 17th October 2006 be approved as correct.        

41.         WHIPPING DECLARATIONS

In accordance with Paragraph 18 of the Performance and Overview Procedure Rules, Members were invited to declare in respect of items where the whip had been applied.  No such declarations were made. 

42.         REFERRALS/RESPONSES FROM THE BOARD/COUNCIL     

The Committee noted that there were no referrals/responses from the Board or Council.    

43.         BOARD REPORTS

The Committee received a synopsis on the following reports falling under its remit which would be considered by the Board at its meeting on 30th November 2006:        

Title

 Report No.

Local Area Agreements

5

Corporate Self Assessment 2006  

10

2006/2007 Financial Monitoring report – to 30th September 06

12

Proposed Amendment to Off Street Car Parking Order in respect of Railway Street, Crewe

15

Open Space Review 

21

Air Quality Management Area – Hospital Street, Nantwich

22

Race Equality Scheme 2006-2008

24

                           A discussion took place on the following reports:

43.1     Crewe Town Centre Masterplan

The Committee was advised that, in order to guard against a ‘piecemeal’ approach to the proposed redevelopment of Crewe town centre and to guide future regeneration, a Masterplan was required.  As the Council did not have the resources ‘in house’ to undertake such a project, consultants would be appointed to carry out the work.  The plan would not be detailed in nature but would be a more visual representation of the Council’s aspirations for the future of Crewe. 

The Committee was supportive of the proposal and made a number of suggestions for inclusion in the plan:

- Definition of the ‘town centre’ should not be too tightly drawn to ensure that adjoining areas (Hightown, Mill Street etc) could also benefit

- Guidance on the types of businesses desired should be included in order to promote diversity  

- References to the provision of leisure facilities (gyms, restaurants, public houses) should be included

- Traffic management needed to be addressed in conjunction with the Crewe Town Centre Access Strategy being developed with Cheshire County Council

It was anticipated that, should time allow, the draft Masterplan would be submitted to the Committee for consideration.

43.2     Clean Neighbourhood & Environmental Act 2005 – Consultation in Relation to the Making of a Dog Control Order

(Note: In accordance with Procedure Rule 26(2), Councillor Hammond spoke on the item with the permission of the Committee.)

The report proposed the adoption of new measures for dog control following the introduction of the Clean Neighbourhood and Environmental Act 2005.  In accordance with the Act, any changes to existing controls had to be subjected to public consultation and Appendix 1 of the report outline the proposals put forward. 

The Committee raised questions in relation to staffing implications, the application of the Order on all carriageways with a speed limit of 40mph or less and the impact on recreational land not subjected to the control, which was responded to as appropriate by the appropriate officers and the Portfolio Holder.             

43.3         Municipal Square, Crewe – Suspension of Certain Works

(Note: In accordance with Procedure Rule 26(2), Councillor Hogben spoke on the item with the permission of the Committee.)             

On 5th June 2006, the Board had requested that a report on the abortive costs associated with the siting of the War Memorial be submitted to a future meeting.  The report of the Chief Executive, now submitted, identified the resultant cost to the authority.

In discussing the final figure, a Member queried whether as part of the exercise the cost of officer time had been identified.  Confirmation was also sought as to whether there had been an overspend on the scheme.  In response, the Chief Executive confirmed that the calculations had not included staff time due to the difficulty in quantifying this and that the scheme had remained in budget as the abortive costs had had to been charged to the Council’s revenue account therefore not affecting the budget set aside for the works.                      

43.4    Nantwich Outdoor Pool – Snowhill Feasibility Study

The carrying out of a commercial assessment of the Snowhill and Riverside area of Nantwich had been agreed by Board in July, in advance of funding being secured for a wider feasibility study.  It was reported to the Committee that the assessment would no longer be progressed as funding for the wider study had now been awarded.

AGREED: That no comment be made to the Board on any of the above reports at this time.    

44.         FORWARD PLAN OF BOARD DECISIONS                             

The Committee received the Board’s Forward Plan for 4th January, 11th January 2007 and 8th February 2007.           

45.          BVPI AND LPI’s MONITORING: APRIL – SEPTEMBER 2006   

The report submitted to the Committee provided service performance information on the agreed basket of Key National Performance Indicators for the period April – September 2006.

It was noted that for PI’s 109a, b and c, the actual number of planning applications determined had been included for ease of understanding.         

46.         VACANCY MANAGEMENT - MONITORING 

The Committee received the report of the Human Resources Manager and noted the decisions of the Vacancy Panel in relation to those posts falling under the Committee’s responsibility.    

(Note:  In accordance with Procedure Rule 26(2), Councillor Hogben spoke on the item with the permission of the Committee.)

46.1     Tourism Development Officer                 

The report of the Vacancy Panel indicated that agreement had been reached to appoint the above post on a part-time, temporary 12-month basis.  Discussions were taking place with the Cheshire and Warrington Tourism Board with a view to jointly funding the post to enable it to be increased to full-time albeit on the same 12-month contract. 

The Committee expressed its concern about the decision.  The profile of tourism was increasing and if harnessed correctly would attract visitors and new businesses to the area.  In addition, the delay in making an appointment had resulted in the Council not being represented at a local awards ceremony which, in the opinion of Members, had reflected badly on the organisation.  In Members’ opinion, to satisfactorily meet the challenges associated with the growth in tourism, the Council required a person to be in post on a full-time permanent basis.                

RECOMMENDATION TO THE BOARD:

The Committee expressed concern about the delay in appointing to the above post and regretted that the appointment would only be on a 12 month temporary contract.  The Members considered that tourism was too important to the borough as a whole to be dealt with on a temporary part time basis.

The Vacancy Panel was asked to reconsider its position with a view to appointing an officer on a full time permanent basis.         

47.         WORK PROGRAMME – TASK GROUP UPDATE  

47.1       Affordable Housing

The Head of Housing updated the Committee on the work of the Affordable Housing Task Group to date.

The Task Group’s remit had been to consider the following issues in relation to affordable housing, with progress noted as follows –

Ø            The effectiveness of the Council’s current housing policies (including a review of current schemes) and identification of changes that may be required to those policies

The Council’s Housing Planning Policy had subsequently been revised

Ø            The role of developers, registered social landlords and local communities in the delivery of affordable housing

The Task Group had received a presentation from the Housing Association which had been considered useful and had identified issues in relation to rural affordable housing needs 

Ø            The use of commuted sums in lieu of affordable housing provision

This issue was of concern and a discussion had been held as to how the sums could be best used

Further work on the issues identified would be required and a revised remit for the Task Group was proposed:

Further guidance should be developed to assist the Council and its partners to deliver affordable housing i.e.

Development and land – to include design

Disposal of land

Commuted sums

Preferred partners and associated benefits from this approach. 

The current Members of the Task Group confirmed that they would be happy to continue in their role.  It was therefore -  

AGREED:  That a) the current Membership of the Affordable Housing Task Group be reaffirmed; and b) the Task Group be invited to consider the issues outlined in paragraph 3.1 of the report (reproduced above) to include the consideration of a procedure for spending commuted sums.                 

47.2     Town Centre’s Cark Parking  

A resume of the outcome of the Town Centre’s Car Parking Task Group’s discussions had been reported at the previous meeting.  The Committee was now invited to consider each of the recommendations in more detail. 

The Business Development Manager and Cllr Moran spoke to the report outlining the issues considered and the rational for each recommendation.  It was confirmed that the relevant proposals had been considered by the Highways and Transportation Local Joint Committee, following which representations had been invited.  The Task Group had reconsidered each proposal in light of objections made.       

a) Thomas Street, Crewe

Current Status:         Free Car Park

Proposal:                   Pay and Display Car Park               

It was anticipated that following the displacement of staff from Delamere House (following its demolition as part of the Modus Scheme), a car parking site would need to be identified to accommodate the Council’s essential car users.  Thomas Street had been identified as a possible location given its proximity to the Municipal Buildings.  Whilst the potential future use of the car park would not prohibit it from being brought into charge, consideration would need to be given as to how the situation could be managed in the future should it prove necessary. 

b) Browning Street

Current Status:         Free Car Park

Proposal:                   Pay and Display Car Park    

The original proposal for Browning Street had been to bring the site into charge whilst setting aside a number of parking bays for local residents by means of a permit scheme, although this had not received public support.  Given that there would be pressure on town centre car parks as a result of the Modus Scheme and to regulate the length of stay it was proposed that the site should become Pay and Display given that residents would be able to park free of charge after 6pm.   A limited waiting period loading bay would need to be provided to service the Limelight Club. 

c) Edleston Road

Current Status:         Free Car Park

Proposal:                   Pay and Display Car Park

Subject to further discussions with the IRIS Centre and the Health Authority to accommodate their needs, the Task Group had recommended that the Car Park be brought into charge. 

d) Wood Street

Current Status:         Free Car Park

Proposal:                   Pay and Display Car Park

Intended as a Shoppers car park, this site was frequently used by long stay users.  Although objections had been received by the public the Nantwich Road Traders and the Task Group supported charging to return the car park to its primary purpose. 

e) Transferable Tickets on a Sunday

Current Status:         Non Transferable Tickets at any Time

Proposal:                   Transferable tickets on Sunday only  

Given the complexity of introducing and administering transferable tickets and the costs involved in updating equipment and signage, the Task Group considered that the non transferable rule should be retained. 

f) Residents Parking Off Street

Proposal:                               To provide residents parking areas in Off-Street Car Parks      

Proposals had been put forward to explore the feasibility of providing residents parking areas in Council owned Off-street car parks.  Whilst demand for such spaces existed; objections to the way in which the scheme would be administered (i.e. the proposed cost of the permits and allocation method) had been received.  Having considered the advantages and disadvantages of the scheme, the Task Group considered that the proposal should not be pursued at this time but could be reconsidered following the introduction of Decriminalised On-Street Parking Enforcement (DPE).

g) Nantwich Road Car Parks (Wood Street [E & W], South St, Edward Rd, Lord St, Union Street)

Current Status:         Free Car Parks

Proposal:                   Pay and Display Car Parks

Consideration had been given to i) the introduction of pay and display at these sites; or ii) residents parking to regulate the number of long stay users.  However, in light of the problems associated with residents parking and given that DPE might also have an impact on the surrounding areas, the Task Group concluded that the car parks should remain free of charge at present but that the situation should be kept under review.   

h) Parking for Town Centre Workers

Current Status:         No specific policy

Proposal:                   Introduce special provisions

The Task Group had considered whether special car parking provision should be made for Town Centre workers but has concluded that to do so would contravene Council Policy which sought to minimise car use with the Town Centre.  No action was therefore proposed.  

Having considered the Task Group’s recommendations, the Committee concurred with the views expressed.  However, a consensus of opinion could not be reached on Browning Street and it was suggested that this matter be referred back to the Task Group for further consideration.      

AGREED: That

a)    Thomas Street be considered for Pay and Display charged public parking only, with further consideration to be given to essential user provision for Council staff at a later date;

b)    Proposals for Browning Street be referred back to the Town Centres’ Car Parking Task Group for further consideration;

c)    A previous proposal to introduce pay and display at Edleston Road be resubmitted;

d)    A previous proposal to introduce pay and display at Wood Street be resubmitted;

e)    The non-transferable rule in relation to Sunday parking be retained;

f)     Off-street Residents Parking should not be pursued at this time;

g)    The car parks listed under (g) above remain as free car parks but that the situation be monitored and reviewed in conjunction with the introduction of Decriminalised On-Street Parking Enforcement; and

h)    No special car parking provision be made for Town Centre workers.

i) Next Steps

It was suggested that the Task Group should turn its attention to car parking sites within Crewe town centre with a view to assisting in the creation of car parking strategies which would tie in with the Town Centre Masterplan and the Modus Scheme.                                 

AGREED: That consideration of and assisting with the creation of car parking strategies for Crewe Town Centre be included in the Task Group’s work programme.                            

47.3     Waste Management

The Waste Management Task Group had met once since the last meeting of the Committee and had considered and discussed the following topics –

Ø      Nottingham declaration in relation to climate change

Ø      Cheshire Waste Contract

Ø      Memorandum of Understanding

Ø      Joint Waste Strategy

Ø      Service Level Agreements

Ø      Trade Waste

Ø      Waste Minimisation

It was noted that the next meeting of the Task Group would be in January 2007. 

 

48.         DATE OF NEXT MEETING

9th January 2007

 

…………………….  Chair