PERFORMANCE AND OVERVIEW
COMMITTEE
LOCAL ECONOMY &
ENVIRONMENT
RECORD OF MEETING HELD ON
13TH JUNE 2006
Present:
Councillor S Roberts (Chair); Councillors D N Bebbington, P K
Butterill, R Cartlidge, A Crawford, P A Hallett, M A Hollins, A C
Johnson, A Moran, S J S Mottram,
R Stafford and L T Wood
In Attendance:
Councillor J Hammond
Portfolio Holder for Local Environment
Councillor S W Hogben
Officers in attendance (for whole or
part):
P Ancell
Executive Director, Environment and Development
P
Burns
Business Development Manager, Direct
Services
D Marren
Executive Director, Direct Services
A Millington
Borough Planning Officer
D Moulson
Democratic Services Officer
R
Lester
Planning Officer, Local Development
Framework
A Wenham Chief
Executive
1.
APOLOGIES
At the request of the Chair, apologies for absence at
Committee would in future be included on the agenda and noted in
the Record of the Meeting.
2.
DECLARATIONS OF INTEREST
Councillor Bebbington declared a personal interest in agenda
item 6 (Board Reports: Consultation War Memorial) on the basis that
he was a former member of the Memorial Action
Team. Councillor Moran declared a personal
interest by virtue of his position as a County Councillor and
specifically in agenda item 8 (Crewe Rail Gateway Draft Development
Brief).
No other Member declared any personal or prejudicial interest
in respect of any item of business on the
agenda.
3.
RECORD OF MEETING
AGREED: That the record of the meeting held on
23rd March 2006 be approved as
correct.
4.
WHIPPING DECLARATIONS
In accordance with Paragraph 18 of the Performance and
Overview Procedure Rules, Members were invited to declare in
respect of items where the whip had been
applied. No such declarations were
made.
5.
RESPONSES/REFERRALS FROM THE BOARD/COUNCIL
It was noted that there were no responses/referrals to report
from the Board or Council.
6.
BOARD BUSINESS
The Committee considered three reports which would be
considered by the Board at its meeting on 15th June 2006
-
·
War Memorial Consultation
Following the decision of the Board to suspend works relating
to the War Memorial on Municipal Square (Decision No. 3,
5th June 2006), proposals had been put forward to carry
out a public consultation exercise using the Citizen's Panel
(Platform) to establish the preferred location for the War Memorial
The report had been marked "to follow" on the Board agenda issued
on 6th June 2006 but was tabled at the meeting.
The Chairman opened the discussion by making a
statement. He questioned the necessity of
incurring the additional costs associated with a consultation
exercise which would be borne by the Council Tax
payers. He referred the
Committee to the findings of an Ombudsman complaint concerning the
validity of the original consultation exercise which had
subsequently been dismissed and stated that, in his view, the Board
was acting unreasonably by opposing the findings of the
Ombudsman. He cautioned that, should the
consultation go ahead, the resultant delay to the works would leave
the Town Centre without its Memorial for the Remembrance Day
service in November.
There was support for the Chairman's views amongst the
Committee. Some Members did not support further
consultation and considered that it was unfair that the cost burden
should be shared by all residents in the borough when the issue
only affected those living in Crewe. A Member
also considered that as the Office of the Deputy Prime Minister had
approved the application to relocate the Memorial, that decision
should be accepted.
Other Members however were of the view that the original
decision to move the War Memorial had not taken into account the
strength of public feeling and the proposal to re-consult would
clarify the public's views on the matter. It was
considered that the Conservative Group was fulfilling an election
pledge to consult the public on the
matter.
The Chief Executive addressed the meeting and commented that
the debate had highlighted that it was in the best interests of the
Council to achieve a final resolution to the matter at the earliest
date. He considered that if a consultation
exercise was to be held, then it needed to be robust, not open to
criticism and the result accepted by all
parties.
As there was no consensus of opinion amongst the Committee,
the Chairman put forward a motion on which a vote was taken
RESPONSE TO THE BOARD:
The Committee considered that the decision to further
delay the erection of the War Memorial was flawed and to cause
additional cost to Council Tax payers by way of further
consultation was
unreasonable.
·
Best Value Performance
Plan
The Best Value Performance Plan (BVPP) was a statutory
document which set out targets for the authority during the
forthcoming year. Following its consideration at
Board, the BVPP would be submitted to Council for final
approval.
The Executive Director Environment and Development drew
Members' attention to three areas of interest in the plan;
affordable housing, quality of service checklist for planning and
vacancy rates for shop units.
·
Filling Of Vacant Posts
The Chairman referred to the proposed policy on the filling of
vacant posts. He requested that, should the
proposals be approved, regular reports be submitted to the
Committee on those posts within the remit of Local Economy &
Environment to allow Members to monitor any potential impact on
services.
7.
FORWARD PLAN OF BOARD
DECISIONS
The Committee received the Board's Forward Plan for 28 June,
27 July, 7 September and 19 October
2006.
8.
PERFORMANCE MONITORING
The Committee considered the performance management report
which provided out-turn performance against statutory Best Value
Performance Indicators (BVPIs) and Local Performance Indicators
(LPIs) for 2005/2006.
The Executive Director Environment and Development
acknowledged that there had been a decline in planning performance
and confirmed that this had been as a result of staffing vacancies
which had now been addressed. Whilst government
targets were being met, performance had fallen short of the
Council's own targets and this was likely to impact on the amount
of Planning Development Grant awarded to the
Council.
9.
CREWE RAIL GATEWAY DRAFT DEVELOPMENT BRIEF
The Committee received a presentation from Robert Lester
(Planning Officer Local Development Framework) and the Borough
Planning Officer which outlined the key elements of the Crewe Rail
Gateway Development Brief.
9.1
Purpose of the Document
The draft development brief had been created to help shape and
guide development in the vicinity of and including Crewe Rail
Station. The document, which had been published
for consultation, would when approved form an appendix to the Local
Development Framework and act as supplementary planning guidance
for the area. The consultation period was due to
end on 21 June 2006.
9.2
Areas of Development/Urban Design
Four main sub-areas had been identified in the plan
Ø Mill
Street/Pedley Street
Ø
Tommy's Lane
Ø The
Horse Landing
Ø Rail
Station Core
which proposed suitable development uses for
each. The document had been constructed in such
a way that whilst each site could be developed independently, the
entire area could be the subject of an overarching
Masterplan.
Design and architecture were considered to be of equal
importance and it was intended that the guidance would encourage
applications to come forward which would make a statement about the
town and its aspirations. It was intended that
the document would also be used as a marketing and promotional
tool.
9.3
Next Steps
§
Consultation responses to be considered
§
Document to be adopted as supplementary planning guidance
§
Statement of consultation to be made
§
Statement of responsibility to be made
§
Final sustainability appraisal to be carried
out
9.4
Discussion/Comment
The Committee was invited to comment on the document
A Member questioned whether it was possible to link the
Railway Station and the Town Centre via Mill
Street. In response, the Committee noted that
consideration was being given to the possibility of opening up an
archway in the Railway Bridge at the bottom end of Mill Street to
improve pedestrian access and provide a visible link to the Town
Centre.
Various suggestions were put forward by Members relating to
improving road links between the two sites (e.g. park and ride, bus
links) which, officers confirmed were being
considered. It was noted that there was an
existing bus service which ran from the Rail Station to the Town
Centre but it was not promoted and there was no signage from the
station for those alighting at Crewe to direct passengers to the
service.
The Committee supported the document's approach to design and
architecture. A Member commented that whilst
most people's perception of Crewe was as a railway town, this was a
unique opportunity for the borough to create its own "Angel of the
North" and to promote Crewe as an area which encouraged iconic and
interesting buildings.
10.
WORK PROGRAMME 2006
10. 1 Content of Work
Programme
For the benefit of new Members of the Committee, a list of
topics to be considered by the Committee as a whole during 2006 was
included on the agenda for information.
10.2 Re-appointment of
Task Groups
The Committee was invited to appoint three Members to the
following Task Groups:
a)
Waste Management Task
Group
Appointed: Councillors
Butterill, Crawford and Mottram
b)
Town Centre and Retail Economy Task Group
Appointed: Councillors Hallett,
Roberts and Wood
c)
Town Centre's Car Parks Task Group
Appointed: Councillors Butterill,
Moran and Stafford
As Affordable Housing was considered to be a cross-cutting
issue, it was proposed that two Members of Performance &
Overview Local Economy & Environment be appointed to the Task
Group and that an invitation be extended to a Member of Performance
& Overview Community Committee to sit on the
Group.
d)
Affordable Housing Task Group
Appointed: Councillors Hollins and
Bebbington
11.
DATE OF NEXT MEETING
Special meeting on 15th June 2006 at
5pm.
..............................
Chair