STATEMENT OF DECISIONS
MADE AT A MEETING OF THE BOARD
HELD ON 8TH
FEBRUARY 2007
PRESENT:
Councillor Brian
Silvester
(Leader of the Council in the Chair)
Councillor Rachel
Bailey
(Portfolio Holder for Planning)
Councillor David
Brickhill
(Portfolio Holder for Economic Development)
Councillor Graham
Fenton
(Portfolio Holder for Finance)
Councillor John
Hammond
(Portfolio Holder for the Local Environment)
Councillor John
Hatfield
(Portfolio Holder for Human Resources)
Councillor Bill
McGinnis
(Portfolio Holder for Leisure)
Councillor Margaret
Simon
(Portfolio Holder for Customers)
Councillor Ray
Westwood
(Portfolio Holder for Neighbourhoods)
NON-BOARD MEMBERS IN ATTENDANCE:
Councillors W T Beard, R Cartlidge, S W Hogben, M R Jones, M
Roberts and M J Weatherill
OFFICERS IN ATTENDANCE:
Paul
Ancell
(Chief Executive)
Lisa
Carr
(Principal Policy Officer)
Jennifer
Cross
(Executive Director Treasury and Corporate Support)
Paul
Goodwin
(Assistant Director Treasury and Corporate Support)
Chris
Henshall
(Deputy Monitoring Officer)
Bill
Howie
(Democratic Services Manager)
Bernadette
Hurst (Assistant
Chief Executive)
Carol
Jones
(Democratic Services Officer)
David
Marren
(Executive Director - Direct Services)
Su
Turner
(Local Strategic Partnership Manager)
Rachel
Welch
(Human Resources Manager)
NOTE: The following Decisions should be read in
conjunction with the corresponding reports which accompanied the
Board Agenda issued on 30th January 2007 together with
revised report No. 15 (Strategic Grants to Voluntary Organisations)
issued on 6th February 2007. The
agenda and reports are available on the Council's Internet
Website. www.crewe-nantwich.gov.uk
149. DECLARATIONS OF
INTEREST
Councillor Ray Westwood declared a personal and prejudicial
interest in agenda item 16 (Community Grant Application) on the
basis that he was a member of Wistaston Sports and Leisure
(Soccer), the applicant.
No other Member made any declaration of interest in any item
of business on the agenda.
150. BOARD DECISIONS
11TH JANUARY 2007
The Board received the Statement of Decisions made at a
meeting held on 11th January 2007.
151.
RECONSIDERATION OF DECISIONS
No decisions had been referred back to the Board for
reconsideration.
152.
CONSIDERATION OF ANY PERFORMANCE AND
OVERVIEW COMMITTEE REPORTS AND
RECOMMENDATIONS
The Performance and Overview Committees had been invited to
comment on Board reports. Comments had been received from the
Performance and Overview Committee (Organisation) and these were
considered under the appropriate headings.
153.
BUDGET AND COUNCIL TAX 2007/2008
The Board considered the report of Councillor Graham Fenton,
Portfolio Holder for Finance.
The report invited the Board to recommend to Council at its
meeting on 21st February 2007, approval of the Capital
Programme and the setting of a sustainable Revenue Budget and
Council Tax for 2007/2008, along with associated Scales of Fees and
Charges.
RECOMMENDATION TO COUNCIL:
That the following be approved
(A)
The Capital Programme
as shown in the Consultation Draft Budget (Section
C);
(B) The General Revenue
Account service revised budgets for 2006/07 and budgets for
2007/08, as shown in the Draft Budget;
(C)
The budget amendments listed at Appendix A, as tabled
at the meeting;
(D)
The Board's budget variations listed at Appendix B,
as tabled at the meeting;
(E)
The General Fund reserves floor and ceiling remain at
£1,250,000 and £1,500,000 respectively to cover the assessed
risks;
(F)
The amounts to be set in accordance with Sections
32-36 of the Local Government Finance Act 1992 for the chargeable
financial year commencing 1 April 2007 as the amounts of Council
Tax for the Borough of Crewe & Nantwich be as set out in
Appendix C, to be tabled at Budget Council on 21st
February 2007; and
(G) The Council
sets its medium-term financial strategy of maintaining an increase
of no more than inflation in Council Tax for each of the next three
years and, to achieve this, makes appropriate changes to the base
budget by, among other things, developing further efficiency gains
to ensure the Council maintains a sustainable budget
position.
Alternative Options:
There were many options available to Members when considering
the Council's Budget and these will no doubt have been further
explored during the consultation period.
Reasons for the Decision:
(a) The Consultation
Draft Budget 2007/2008 has been considered in various consultation
exercises during January and February 2007.
(b)
The Budget includes services
which contribute positively to the development of the built and
natural environment.
(c)
The Budget considers the use of revenue resources, in the
context of the Revenue Strategy 2005-2010.
(d)
The Budget includes activities which contribute positively,
directly or indirectly, to reducing anti-social
behaviour.
(e)
The Revenue Budget and Capital Programme contribute to
the delivery of the four key corporate priorities, other
service objectives and statutory
responsibilities.
154.
CAPITAL FINANCE: PRUDENTIAL INDICATORS AND
TREASURY
MANAGEMENT
The Board considered the report of Councillor Graham Fenton,
Portfolio Holder for Finance.
The report covered the various requirements of both the
Prudential Code for Capital Finance and the Codes of Practice on
Treasury Management. These were professional
codes, published by the Chartered Institute of Public Finance and
Accountancy (CIPFA), which supported appropriate legislation.
The Board was asked to recommend to Council approval of the
Prudential Indicators and the Treasury Management Strategy and
revised list of Approved Organisations for Investment.
It was noted that the Performance and Overview Committee
(Organisation) had supported the recommendation.
RECOMMENDATION TO COUNCIL:
(A)
That the Prudential Indicators for 2007/2008 in Appendix A
of the report be approved; and
(B) That the Treasury
Management Strategy for 2007/2008 in Appendix B of the report, and
the revised list of Approved Organisations for investment, in
Appendix C of the report, be approved.
Alternative Options:
Potential options were identified in the report, but not
recommended.
Reasons for the Decision:
(a) The
Local Government Act 2003 requires the Council to follow the CIPFA
Prudential Code for Capital Finance. The Prudential Code requires
the Council to set a range of indicators for 2007/2008 and
subsequent years as part of the budget-setting process.
(b) In
addition to the relevant prudential indicators, the Code of
Practice on Treasury Management requires the Council to formulate a
Treasury Management (Borrowing and Investment) Strategy for
2007/2008 and to report Treasury Management performance.
(c) The
objective of the professional codes is to provide a framework for
Local Authority Capital Finance and Treasury Management which will
ensure that:
-
Capital expenditure plans are affordable;
-
All external borrowing and other long-term liabilities are within
prudent and sustainable levels;
-
Treasury Management decisions are taken in accordance with
professional good practice;
-
In taking such decisions the Council is accountable; and
-
The framework supports local strategic planning, asset management
planning and proper option appraisal.
155.
SOCIAL INCLUSION STRATEGY
The Board considered the report of Councillor Ray Westwood,
Portfolio Holder for Neighbourhoods.
The report informed Members that the Social Inclusion
Strategy, which was the first produced by the Borough Council,
focused on identifying and supporting traditionally excluded groups
within the Borough.
The Board was asked to approve the Strategy.
DECISION:
That the Social Inclusion Strategy for the Borough be
approved.
Alternative Options:
(a)
Amend the Strategy and make other recommendations; or
(b)
Decline to accept the Strategy.
Reasons for the Decision:
(a)
Whilst it is not a statutory requirement, it is considered good
practice for a local authority to produce a Social Inclusion
Strategy as it demonstrates a recognition of the barriers which are
faced by some sectors of the community.
(b)
It provides an evidence base to support recommendations made to
address the actions identified, and consultation carried out on
some of the themes may provide additional supporting evidence for
other strategy or policy development.
(c)
Failure to implement the Strategy may result in sectors of the
community remaining excluded and result in a "piecemeal" approach
to issues via other strategies.
156.
DISABILITY EQUALITY SCHEME 2006-2009
The Board considered the report of Councillor John Hatfield,
Portfolio Holder for Human Resources.
The Disability Discrimination Act 2005 placed a duty on all
public authorities to promote disability equality by imposing
general and specific duties.
The report contained details of the draft Disability Equality
Scheme and the Board was asked to approve it.
It was noted that the Performance and Overview Committee
(Organisation) had supported the recommendation.
DECISION:
That the Disability Equality Scheme 2006-2009 be
approved.
Alternative Options:
None considered.
Reasons for the Decision:
(a)
It is a statutory requirement under the Disability Discrimination
Act 2005 that a Disability Equality Scheme be published.
(b)
The Scheme has been developed with the involvement of various
groups representing the disabled. They will
continue to be consulted regularly.
(c)
The preparation of the Scheme will mainstream disability equality
into the Council's policies and practices, improving services which
the Council provides and promoting the Council's commitment to
equality and diversity.
157.
JOB EVALUATION/SINGLE STATUS PAY AND GRADING
STRUCTURE
The Board considered the report of Councillor John Hatfield,
Portfolio Holder for Human Resources.
The report detailed the proposed new pay and grading structure
and associated work arrangements/benefits package for the
organisation with effect from 1st June 2007.
RECOMMENDATION TO COUNCIL:
(A) That the new pay
and grading structure and associated changes to
employee terms and conditions be approved; and
(B) That the total
employee reward package be adopted with effect from 1st
June 2007.
Alternative Option:
To amend the proposals for further consultation with the
unions.
Reason for the Decision:
The new pay and grading structure will provide the Council
with a fair and sustainable system based on appropriate job
evaluation and will eradicate unfair differences in terms and
conditions and ultimately enable the Council to mitigate against
any equal pay claims from employees.
158.
PROGRESS REPORT ON THE COMMUNITY AND NEIGHBOURHOOD
RENEWAL STRATEGIES
The Local Government Act 2000 and the subsequent White Paper
placed a responsibility on local authorities to produce a community
strategy in partnership with other agencies to improve the social,
economic and environmental well-being of an
area. The latest Community Strategy was launched
in January 2006, followed shortly afterwards by the Neighbourhood
Renewal Strategy.
The Board noted the joint report of Councillor Brian
Silvester, Leader of the Council and Councillor Ray Westwood,
Portfolio Holder for Neighbourhoods.
159.
2006/2007 FINANCIAL MONITORING REPORT TO
31ST DECEMBER 2006
The Board received the report of Councillor Graham Fenton,
Portfolio Holder for Finance.
The report provided Members with information in relation to
actual expenditure and income in the current financial year, for
the period 1st April to 31st December
2006.
160.
DATA QUALITY STRATEGY 2007-2010
The Board considered the report of Councillor John Hatfield,
Portfolio Holder for Human Resources.
As a result of the Data Quality and BVPIs 2006/2007 audit
undertaken by Baker Tilly (external auditors) during July-August
2006, the final draft report had been issued stating that the
authority had achieved a Level 3 award, out of a grading system of
1 to 4, with 4 being ranked as performing
strongly. Notwithstanding this, there were
a number of recommendations raised by the auditors, which had now
been included in the Action Plan of the draft Data Quality Strategy
2007-2010.
DECISION:
That the Data Quality Strategy 2007-2010, together
with supporting Action Plan, be approved.
Alternative Options:
None considered.
Reasons for the Decision:
The Strategy was the Borough Council's first Data Quality
Strategy; there is no legal requirement to
prepare such a strategy but adherence to it would ensure that the
authority's data quality would be of a high standard and will
inform appropriate operational decisions in the way services are
planned, managed and undertaken.
161.
BEST VALUE PERFORMANCE INDICATORS PROGRESS REPORT
FOR QUARTER THREE (31ST DECEMBER 2006)
2006/2007
The Board considered the report of Councillor John Hatfield,
Portfolio Holder for Human Resources.
The report gave details of the results of the key basket of
performance indicators for the third quarter of the financial year
and were submitted for the Board's attention, together with the
2005-2006 quartile positioning summary and proposed target
forecasts for the period 2007-2011.
It was noted that the Performance and Overview Committee
(Organisation) had supported the recommendation.
DECISION:
(A)
That the position in respect of the key basket of performance
indicators for the third quarter, together with the 2005-2006
quartile positioning summary be noted; and
(B) That
the proposed target forecasts for the period 20072011 be
approved.
Alternative Option:
To amend the performance targets for the period
2007-2011.
Reason for the Decision:
The authority is required to prepare performance information
which is up-dated annually. The Board considers
the annual up-dates and also sets performance targets.
162.
CONSULTATION PROGRAMME 2006-2009
The Board considered the report of Councillor Margaret Simon,
Portfolio Holder for Customers.
The report set out a proposed three-year Consultation
Programme, gave details of progress on the 2006/2007 Consultation
Programme and provided brief information on the proposed three-year
Consultation Plan 2007-2009.
DECISION:
(A) That the draft
Consultation Plan for 2007-2009 be approved;
(B) That progress on
the Consultation Programme for 2006/2007 be noted;
(C) That communication
of the Consultation Checklist and associated Strategy be
undertaken; and
(D) That the Checklist
be adhered to by Officers and Councillors when appropriate, to
ensure reliable evidence is collected.
Alternative Options:
To delete or make alternative proposals for non-statutory
consultation.
Reasons for the Decision:
(a)
The preparation of a three-year consultation programme will
improve planning and ensure adequate resources are in place to
deliver Council services.
(b) T
he Programme is in line with the Council's commitment to
secure improvements in the way in which residents are surveyed and
consulted, the quality of the information obtained and the use of
that information to improve the quality and relevance of services
provided.
(c) Continued
improvements in the Council's approach to consultation is expected
to result in noticeable improvements to Council services and to the
borough as a whole.
163.
STRATEGIC GRANTS TO VOLUNTARY ORGANISATIONS
2007/2008
The Board considered the report of Councillor Ray Westwood,
Portfolio Holder for Neighbourhoods, submitted with the
agenda.
The Advisory Panel met on 1st February 2007 and its
recommendations had been included in a further report issued under
separate cover on 6th February 2007.
Strategic grant awards in excess of £5,000 required approval
by the Board. The Portfolio Holder's Grants
Advisory Panel had made recommendations for the annual award of
core funding (running costs) to voluntary organisations for
2007/2008, which met the criteria approved by the Borough
Council.
DECISION:
Subject to appropriate budgetary provision being
approved by Council:
(A)
The Strategic Grants over £5,000
listed in Appendix 1 of the report be awarded; and
(B)
The grant in respect of the
Central Community Group be subject to receipt of satisfactory
accounts.
Alternative Options:
Not to award or to amend the grants listed in the
report.
Reasons for the Decision:
(a) Grant
applications were assessed by Officers in line with the objectives
reflected in the Community Strategy and the applicants were
offering services which gave significant benefit to the
community.
(b) The
grants will assist the Voluntary Organisations with their core
costs and are within the Council's existing budget provision.
164.
COMMUNITY GRANT APPLICATION
The Board considered the report of Councillor Ray Westwood,
Portfolio Holder for Neighbourhoods.
The Portfolio Holder for Neighbourhoods had been granted
delegated power to determine applications under the Grants Scheme
(up to £5,000). Councillor Ray Westwood had
declared a personal and prejudicial interest in the Community Grant
Application for Wistaston Sports and Leisure (Soccer) on the basis
that he was a member. The application had,
therefore, been referred to the Board for decision, as the body by
which the delegation had been made.
DECISION:
That a grant of £500 be made to Wistaston Sports and
Leisure (Soccer).
Alternative options:
(a)
Award a grant of a different amount; or
(b)
Decline the application.
Reasons for the Decision:
The grant is within existing budget provision and meets the
criteria.
(Note: Having declared a personal and
prejudicial interest in this item, Councillor Ray Westwood withdrew
from the meeting during discussion.)
165.
CULTURE SERVICE LEVEL AGREEMENT 2007/2008
The Board considered the report of Councillor Bill McGinnis,
Portfolio Holder for Leisure.
The Council worked in partnership with a number of
organisations to provide community development
activities. Details of the work undertaken by
partners, on the Council's behalf, were contained in Service Level
Agreements which were refreshed annually.
DECISION:
(A) Subject to appropriate
budgetary provision being approved by Council, the Service
Level Agreements for 2007-2008 be approved,
as follows:
(i) Cheshire
Dance
£14,400
(ii) Manchester
Camerata
£7,170
(iii) Nantwich
Museum
£16,000
(B) That the Cultural
Development Manager be authorised to sign the Service Level
Agreements on behalf of the Council; and
(C) That the
requirement to tender under the Regulations as to
Contracts
be waived.
Alternative Options:
(a) To approve different
amounts of funding; or
(b) Not to approve the
Service Level Agreements for 2007-2008.
Reasons for the Decision:
(a) The agreements have
implications affecting the sustainability of the organisations
concerned. The funding that CNBC provides forms part of a
comprehensive funding stream for each of the three organisations
and reflects partnership working with the voluntary sector, private
sector, Arts Council England North-West and Cheshire County
Council.
(b) The activities
provide opportunities for young people to become positively
engaged in community activity that is stimulating
and educational.
(c) Appropriate services will
be delivered through Service Level Agreements in accordance with
the Community Strategy with particular reference to Culture and
Leisure.
........................................Signed