STATEMENT OF DECISIONS MADE AT A
MEETING OF THE BOARD
HELD ON 6th SEPTEMBER
2006
PRESENT:
Councillor Brian
Silvester
(Leader of the Council
in the Chair)
Councillor Margaret Simon
(Portfolio Holder for Customers)
Councillor Rachel
Bailey
(Portfolio Holder for
Planning)
Councillor David
Brickhill
(Portfolio Holder for
Economic Development)
Councillor John Dwyer
(Portfolio Holder for Safer Communities)
Councillor Graham
Fenton
(Portfolio Holder for Finance)
Councillor John
Hammond
(Portfolio
Holder for the Local Environment)
Councillor B
McGinnis
(Portfolio Holder for Leisure)
Councillor Ray
Westwood
(Portfolio Holder for Neighbourhoods)
NON-BOARD MEMBERS IN ATTENDANCE:
Councillors T E Ankers, W T Beard, J Bratherton, D Bebbington,
P K Butterill, R Cartlidge, D Charlesworth, T R Dunlop, M R
Jones, S W Hogben, and A Moran.
OFFICERS IN ATTENDANCE:
Paul Ancell
(Executive Director, Environment & Development)
Jane
Ashcroft
(Principal Officer Arts and Entertainment)
Lisa
Carr
(Policy and Performance Officer)
Jenny Cross
(Executive Director, Treasury and Corporate Support)
Chris
Henshall
(Borough Solicitor)
Bernadette
Hurst
(Assistant Chief Executive, Community Development and Social
Policy)
David
Marren
(Executive Director, Direct Services)
Alan
Millington
(Borough Planning Officer)
Joanne
Smith
(Democratic Services Officer)
Rachel
Welch
(Human Resources Manager)
ALSO IN ATTENDANCE:
Keith Ward
Baker Tilly (Auditors)
NOTE: The following Decisions should be read in
conjunction with the corresponding reports which accompanied the
Board Agenda issued on 29th August 2006 and the subsequent letter
sent out on 31st August
2006.
57.
DECLARATIONS OF INTEREST
Councillors D Charlesworth, T R Dunlop and B G Silvester
declared a personal interest in Agenda Item 5 War
Memorial Consultation as they were members of the citizens'
panel (Platform).
Councillor D Bebbington declared a personal interest in Agenda
Item 5 War Memorial Consultation as he was a former member of
the Memorial Action Team.
Councillor D Brickhill declared a personal interest in Agenda
Item 8 Local Area Agreements, Agenda Item 14 Consultation on
the Future of Health Scrutiny Arrangements in Cheshire, Agenda
Item 16 Air Quality Management Area and Agenda Item 23
Discretionary Rate Relief Review as
he was a County Councillor.
Councillors A Moran and M J Simon declared a personal interest
in Agenda Item 8 Local Area Agreements, Agenda Item 16 Air
Quality Management Area and Agenda Item 23 Discretionary Rate
Relief Review as they were County Councillors.
Councillors A Moran and M J Simon declared a personal and
prejudicial interest in Item 14 Consultation on the Future of
Health Scrutiny Arrangements in Cheshire as they had
participated in a meeting where a decision had been made on
this matter as County Councillors.
Councillor R Westwood declared a personal and prejudicial
interest in Item 23 Discretionary Rate Relief Review as he was a
member of Wulvern Housing Board.
No other Member made any declaration of interest in any item
of business on the agenda.
58.
BOARD DECISIONS 27th JULY 2006
The Board received the Statement of Decisions made at a
meeting held on 27th July 2006.
59.
RECONSIDERATION OF DECISIONS
No decisions had been referred back to the Board for
reconsideration.
60.
CONSIDERATION OF ANY PERFORMANCE AND
OVERVIEW COMMITTEE REPORTS AND
RECOMMENDATIONS
The Performance and Overview Committees had been invited to
comment on Board reports. Comments received from Performance and
Overview Committee, Organisation were considered under the
appropriate headings.
61.
CONSULTATION WAR MEMORIAL
The Board considered the report of Councillor Rachel Bailey,
Portfolio Holder for Planning.
The Board, at its meeting on 15th June 2006
(Decision No 9) agreed that consultation be carried out on the
preferred location of the War Memorial in Crewe Town Centre using
Platform. The report provided details of the
outcome of the consultation and consequently the Board was asked to
make a decision on the location of the refurbished War
Memorial.
DECISION:
(A)
That the results of the consultation be accepted and that
the relocation of the War Memorial and all related memorial items
within the Municipal Square, Crewe be approved; and
(B)
That Officers be authorised to liaise with the contractors
to ensure all works are completed to enable the rededication of the
War Memorial and Remembrance Service to take place in the
Municipal Square in November 2006.
Alternative Options:
In light of the results of the Consultation it was not
considered appropriate to consider any other options.
Reasons for the Decision:
(a)
The Board was
committed to pay close attention to the outcome of the the
consultation exercise which was clearly in favour of the
Municipal Square as the preferred location.
(b)
There is a limited time to complete the works by November
2006, however, early discussions with contractors indicate it is
achievable. A programme can now be put into
place to complete the refurbishment of the Municipal Square in
accordance with the approved plans.
62.
AUDITOR'S REPORT ON THE 2005/2006 STATEMENT OF
ACCOUNTS
The Board considered the report of Councillor Graham Fenton,
Portfolio Holder for Finance.
Keith Ward, Baker Tilly attended the meeting to report the
Auditor's view of the Council's 2005/06 Statement of Accounts in
accordance with the International Standards on Auditing No 260 (ISA
no 260).
Comments received from Performance and Overview
Committee, Organisation who wished to convey its appreciation
to Treasury and Corporate Support for its exemplary work over
the last twelve months, which had resulted in a satisfactory report
were noted.
DECISION:
(A)
That the report of the Auditor on the Council's 2005/06
Statement of Accounts be received; and
(B) T
hat the Executive Director, Treasury and Corporate Support
be authorised to sign the required 'Letter of Representation" on
behalf of the Council.
Alternative Option:
Not to accept the contents of the report.
Reasons for the Decision:
(a)
The Auditor has a duty to report to those charged with governance
any matters arising from the audit of the financial
statements.
(b)
The report is an independent professional view of the Council's
financial statements, following an external audit of the Accounts
carried out in accordance with best
practice.
63.
OPEN SPACE REVIEW
The Board considered the report of Councillor Bill McGinnis,
Portfolio Holder for Leisure.
The Council had undertaken a review of open space within the
Borough. The work involved an audit of over four
hundred areas of open space, measuring levels of provision against
national standards of provision and establishing local standards of
provision. A number of sites had been identified
as potentially being surplus to requirements and a number of sites
were identified as priorities for improvement.
The report provided details of the proposals to undertake technical
site surveys and develop site improvement plans.
DECISION:
That a sum of up to £100,000 be allocated from the
Capital Contingency Fund to undertake site surveys and develop
improvement programmes with contractual arrangements deferred until
legal opinion had been obtained on the implications arising from
the Commons Act 2006.
Alternative Option:
Not to approve the allocation of funding for site
surveys.
Reasons for the Decision:
(a)The disposals of surplus areas of
open space will fund improvements to other areas thereby improving
their sustainability in the future.
(b) The disposal of land will involve
local level consultation therefore it will be necessary to develop
improvement plans for the areas which can offer options for local
residents to consider.
64.
LOCAL AREA AGREEMENTS
The Board considered the report of Councillor Brian Silvester,
Leader of the Council and Councillor Ray Westwood, Portfolio Holder
for Neighbourhoods.
At its meeting on 15th June 2006 the Board granted
delegated authority to the Portfolio Holder for Neighbourhoods and
the Assistant Chief Executive, Community Development and Social
Policy to approve the high level outcomes from the draft Cheshire
Local Area Agreement (LAA) once they were agreed by the Communities
of Cheshire Partnership. These outcomes were
agreed and sent to Government Office North West (GONW) by the
deadline of the 30th June 2006. The
report provided an update on the current position in respect of the
Cheshire Local Area Agreement.
DECISION:
(A)
That the High Level outcomes approved by the Portfolio
Holder for Neighbourhoods and the Assistant Chief Executive,
Community Development and Social Policy be noted;
(B)
That the content of the report be noted; and
(C)
That delegated authority be granted to the Assistant Chief
Executive, Community Development and Social Policy in consultation
with the Leader of the Council and the Portfolio Holder for
Neighbourhoods, to endorse the draft Local Area Agreement prior to
its submission to Government Office North West.
Alternative Options:
To amend or reject the proposals contained within the
report.
Reasons for the Decision:
(a)Cheshire will be subject to a Local
Area Agreement from April 2007 and the full draft LAA is required
for submission to GONW by the end of September 2006.
(b) The LAA is a statutory duty that
will help to make public services more responsive to community
needs and develop sustainable communities.
65.
BEST VALUE PERFORMANCE INDICATORS PROGRESS REPORT FOR QUARTER
1 2006/2007
The Board considered, for information, the report of
Councillor John Hatfield, Portfolio Holder for Human
Resources.
The report provided service performance information on the
agreed basket of Key National Performance Indicators for the first
quarter of the financial year (April July 2006).
66.
BOROUGH PROFILE MEASURES 2006/07
The Board considered the report of Councillor John Hatfield,
Portfolio Holder for Human Resources.
The Performance team had identified a number of Borough
Profile Measures that would be reported to the Board on an annual
basis. The report provided details of these
measures.
DECISION:
That the Borough Profile data set out in the report be
approved as the topic areas to be presented to Board annually to
assist in the Corporate Review Process.
Alternative Options:
Not applicable.
Reasons for the Decision:
During the external audit visit in February this year the
external auditor commented on the role and validity of the critical
indicators, particularly as the majority of the indicators formed
part of other reporting baskets. These
indicators have been reviewed and the new Borough Profile Measures
identified will assist the Corporate Review Process.
67.
CREWE RAIL GATEWAY DEVELOMENT BRIEF
The Board considered the report of Councillor Rachel Bailey,
Portfolio Holder for Planning.
The draft Development Brief was approved for the purposes of
consultation on 28th March 2006. That
period of consultation took place between 10th May and
21st June 2006. The report outlined
the comments received and recommended certain amendments to the
brief.
DECISION:
That the Crewe Rail Gateway Development Brief, as
amended, be formally adopted as a Supplementary Planning
Document.
Alternative Options:
None considered.
Reasons for the Decision:
(a)
The preparation of a Supplementary Planning Document is a
requirement set out in the Local Development Scheme, as
revised.
(b)
The Development Brief will accord with the local plan Policy
BE.2 to ensure that the design and layout provides for public
safety and deters vandalism and crime.
(c)
Failure to adopt the brief could result in unacceptable
planning proposals being submitted and a consequent Public Inquiry
being necessary.
68.
PLANNING DELIVERY GRANT/PLANNING DEPARTMENT
The Board considered the report of Councillor Rachel Bailey,
Portfolio Holder for Planning.
The report set out the proposals for a programme of
expenditure in 2006/07 on both capital and revenue items based on
the 2006 settlement and the anticipated receipt of Planning
Delivery Grant (PDG) until the grant was terminated in 2009.
DECISION:
(A) That the 2006/07 Revenue and Capital expenditure
under Planning Delivery Grant as outlined in Tables 1 and 2 of the
report be approved; and
(B)
That a report
be submitted to Board when the 2007/08 award is confirmed to
consider arrangements for that award and if possible for
maintaining the service post-Planning Delivery
Grant.
Alternative Option:
To spend up to the anticipated level of award.
Reasons for Decision:
(a)
The Planning Delivery Grant has been used to put a programme into
place of both capital and revenue improvements to address the
Department's performance targets and to improve the quality of the
service.
(b)
An assessment of the number of posts and roles which will be
permanently required to maintain current service delivery is needed
in order that the longer term funding of appropriate permanent
posts can be planned for.
69.
BUILDING CONTROL COLLABORATIVE WORKING
The Board considered the report of Councillor Rachel Bailey,
Portfolio Holder for Planning.
The report set out the proposed arrangements for a joint
Building Control Service with Congleton and Macclesfield Borough
Councils, which had been formulated following agreement in
principle to joint working from all three Authorities, earlier in
the year. A considerable amount of collaborative
working had taken place to bring forward viable proposals, which
were summarised in a proposed Business Plan.
DECISION:
That the proposals for collaborative working as set
out in the report be supported.
RECOMMENDATION TO COUNCIL:
(A)
That Crewe and Nantwich Borough Council's Building Control
functions be delegated to the proposed Joint Committee (with any
necessary changes made to this Council's
Constitution);
(B)
That two Councillors be nominated to sit on the Joint
Committee; and
(C)
That the shared set up costs of £50,000 be funded from the
Building Control accumulated surplus.
Alternative Option:
Not to agree to the proposals set out in the report.
Reasons for the Decision:
(a)
It is considered that a combined service would provide
opportunities for improvement enabling the service to move forward
more efficiently allowing Officers to become more effective,
improving customer satisfaction and increasing market
share.
(b)
The proposal will provide the opportunity for each Authority to
participate fully and share ownership, providing a service equipped
and ready to pro-actively engage in service delivery.
70.
CONSULTATION ON THE FUTURE OF HEALTH SCRUTINY ARRANGEMENTS IN
CHESHIRE
The Board considered the report of Councillor John Dwyer,
Portfolio Holder for Safer Communities.
The Health and Social Care Act 2001 required all authorities
with Social Services responsibilities to have arrangements in place
to review any matter relating to the planning, provision or
operation of health services in their area. In
Cheshire the authority was the County Council.
The County Council was now considering a change to the existing
local arrangements and the report outlined the three options being
considered by the County Health Scrutiny Committee.
DECISION:
(A)
That Cheshire County Council's preferred option is not
supported; and
(B)
That this Council prefers to retain the local approach to
scrutiny by merging the present Central Cheshire and Eastern
Cheshire local joint committees to mirror the recently configured
East Cheshire Primary Care Trust.
Alternative Options:
The three options are detailed in the report.
Reasons for the Decision:
The Government has introduced changes to the configuration of
the Primary Care Trusts (PCTs) in Cheshire, whereby the four PCTs
will become two in October 2006. The option to
merge the present Central Cheshire and Eastern Cheshire local joint
committees would continue the direct relationship between PCT and
local scrutiny committee. There would be scope to focus on local
issues as and when required.
(Note: Having declared a personal and prejudicial
interest Councillors Moran and Simon withdrew from the meeting for
this item).
71.
GAMBLING ACT 2005
The Board considered the report of Councillor John Dwyer,
Portfolio Holder for Safer Communities.
The Gambling Act 2005 comes into force on 1st
September 2007. On that date the Council would
replace the Courts as licensing authority for all premises in the
Borough at which gambling took place. In order
to carry out its function as the licensing authority for gambling,
the Council must have in place a licensing policy, known as its
Statement of Principles. The report provided
details of the draft Statement of Principles.
DECISION:
That the draft Statement of Principles be approved for
the purpose of a public consultation exercise.
Alternative Option:
None considered.
Reasons for the Decision:
(a)
The Gambling Act 2005 places a statutory responsibility on
the Council to carry out the licensing function for premises used
for gambling.
(b)
The Statement of Principles must be in place by
31st January 2007 when the Council will start to
determine applications for licences made under transitional
arrangements prior to the new licensing regime coming into
force in September 2007.
72.
AIR QUALITY MANAGEMENT AREA HOSPITAL STREET,
NANTWICH
The Board considered the report of Councillor John Dwyer,
Portfolio Holder for Safer Communities.
On 28th March 2006, the Board agreed to consult on
a proposal to declare an Air Quality Management Area in part of
Hospital Street, Nantwich. The Council had a
duty to declare such an Area, by Order, when levels of nitrogen
dioxide were found to be above the objectives set by the Department
for the Environment, Food and Rural Affairs. The
period for consultation had now ended and a steering group had been
set up to undertake the action planning process for the proposed
area. The report contained details of the
proposals by the steering group to define the limits of the
proposed area for consultation with all interested parties.
DECISION:
That the report defining the limits of the proposed
Air Quality Management Area be approved for consultation with all
interested parties in accordance with the Council's duties under
the Environment Act 1995.
Alternative Option:
Not to approve the report for consultation with interested
parties.
.
Reasons for the Decision:
(a) The Council is required to consult
all interested parties regarding definition of the Area prior to
declaration in accordance with its duties under the Environment Act
1995.
(b) The Environment Act 1995 has
statutory requirements. If an Order is not
declared the Secretary of State has reserve powers to take
action.
73.
REVIEW OF REDUNDANCY POLICY
The Board considered the report of Councillor John Hatfield,
Portfolio Holder for Human Resources.
The current Redundancy & Redeployment Policy had been in
place for 10 years. In light of significant
changes in employment law and in particular the introduction of age
discrimination legislation the policy had been reviewed. The report
provided details of the main changes to the policy.
DECISION:
That the changes to the existing Redundancy &
Redeployment Policy be approved for further union
consultation.
Alternative Options:
That the recommended changes be amended or rejected.
Reasons for the Decision:
(a)
The policy has been updated to reflect the current
organisational structure and the provisions of the Employment
Act 1996.
(b)
The proposed amendments update and review the provisions of
the policy in line with the changing legal and operational
climate and have been reviewed by the Council's Employment
Lawyers.
(c)
The revisions to the policy will enable the Council to work
with a robust and up to date document and will provide better
support to staff through a managed redeployment
process.
74.
JOB EVALUATION/SINGLE STATUS PRINCIPLES OF PAY &
GRADING STRUCTURE
The Board considered the report of Councillor John Hatfield,
Portfolio Holder for Human Resources.
The report provided an update on the progress made in devising
a new pay & grading structure as a result of the completion of
Job Evaluation (JE). Interviews for JE were
concluded in June 2006 and over the last two months effective
consultation with the Trade Unions had led to agreement on a broad
set of principles for a new pay and grading
structure. The report detailed the proposals for
these principles which would sit behind the structure of the new
pay & grading system.
DECISION:
That the proposals for the structure of the new pay
and grading system be approved, in principle, as a basis for
negotiation and the pay modelling exercise.
Alternative Options:
That the proposals be amended or rejected.
Reasons for the Decision:
(a)
The Single Status Agreement requires the Authority to assess
the existing pay system against the statutory provisions for
equal pay.
(b)
The principles proposed complement the Council's drive to
achieve the workforce requirements of the Single Status
Agreement.
(c)
The principles will provide the basis of the pay modelling
exercise to produce a transparent and robust pay
structure.
75.
2007/08 BUDGET PREPARATION TIMETABLE
The Board considered the report of Councillor Graham Fenton,
Portfolio Holder for Finance.
The report presented the planned timetable for 2007/08 revenue
and capital budget preparations.
DECISION:
That the 2007/08 Budget Preparation Timetable be
approved.
Alternative Options:
To amend or reject the Budget Preparation Timetable.
Reasons for the Decision:
Determination of the revenue and capital budgets for 2007/08
will involve significant decisions on the generation and use of the
Council's resources. The timetable allows for
careful consideration of the issues by a number of key
stakeholders.
76.
APPOINTMENT TO AN OUTSIDE ORGANISATION
At its meeting on 15th June 2006 the Board
appointed Councillors M A Martin and S Mottram as the two
substantive representatives on Muir Group Housing Association, with
Councillor Maureen Campbell as the deputy.
Subsequent to that, Councillor Campbell had resigned her place,
with immediate effect.
The Board was invited to appoint a replacement deputy to Muir
Group Housing Association, to serve for the remainder of the
Municipal Year.
DECISION:
That Councillor R Salmon be appointed as the deputy
representative to Muir Group Housing Association for the remainder
of the Municipal Year.
Alternative Option:
To appoint an alternative Member to the association.
Reasons for the Decision:
The Council's role as a Community Leader is significantly
enhanced by the involvement of Members in the network of local
organisations that operate throughout the Borough.
77.
REPORT OF THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, DIRECT
SERVICES
(FOR INFORMATION)
In accordance with Contract Regulations, the Executive
Director, Direct Services reported on tenders that had
recently been invited and received.
78.
EXCLUSION OF PRESS AND PUBLIC
RESOLVED : That the press and public be excluded from
the meeting during consideration of the following items
pursuant to Section 100(A) (4) of the Local Government Act
1972 on the grounds that they involve the likely
disclosure of exempt information as defined in
Paragraphs 1 and 3 of Part 1 of Schedule 12A (as
amended) of the Act.
79.
DISCRETIONARY RATE RELIEF REVIEW (PARAGRAPH 3)
The Board considered the report of Councillor Graham Fenton,
Portfolio Holder for Finance.
The Discretionary Rate Relief Policies for Charities and other
non-profit making organisations were established in
2003. As a consequence of enquiries and
applications received since then, certain issues had
been identified and minor amendments and clarifications were
now considered necessary. These amendments
were detailed in the report.
DECISION:
(A)
That point 1 (f) of the current policy be amended to
remove the award of 20% discretionary relief to qualifying sports
clubs that operate a licensed bar;
(B)
That point 1 (h) of the current policy be amended to
read: Registered Friendly Societies that meet Government guidelines
for rate relief in respect of tax exemption and membership policy:
80% mandatory relief only;
(C)
That delegated authority be granted to the Executive
Director, Treasury and Corporate Support in consultation with the
Portfolio Holder for Finance to determine applications for
discretionary top up from qualifying Friendly Societies to ensure
they are in the financial interests of the local community;
and
(D)
That the revised policy shown at Appendix B of the
report be approved.
Alternative Options
To reject or amend the proposals contained within the
report.
Reasons for the Decision:
The amendments will address possible anomalies in the
current Discretionary Rate Relief Policy.
(Note: Having declared a personal and prejudicial
interest Councillor R Westwood withdrew from the meeting for this
item).
80.
REVIEW OF RURAL DISCRETIONARY RATE RELIEF (PARAGRAPH
3)
The Board considered the report of Councillor Graham Fenton,
Portfolio Holder for Finance.
The Rural Discretionary Rate Relief Policy was due for review
before 1st April 2007. Minor
amendments to the policy were now required and the
report provided details of the proposed amendments.
DECISION:
(A)
That the award of 30% relief to current and new
discretionary only applicants be continued, with 12 months notice
to be given for any future amendments in line with all other rate
relief applicants;
(B)
That the revised wording for 'Sole Petrol Filling
Stations', to clarify applications from those with rateable values
above the mandatory limit but within the discretionary only limit,
be approved; and
(C)
That the revised Policy shown in Appendix B of the
report be approved.
Alternative Options
To reject or amend the proposals contained within the
report.
Reasons for the Decision:
The amendments will provide clarity to the current Rural
Discretionary Relief Policy.
Note at this point a brief adjournment to the meeting
was agreed prior to the consideration of the following
items.
81.
APPLICATION FOR EARLY RETIREMENT (PARAGRAPH 1)
The Board considered the report of Councillor John Hatfield,
Portfolio Holder for Human Resources.
The report contained details of an application for early
retirement from postholder no CE 0001.
RECOMMENDATION TO COUNCIL:
That the application for early retirement from
postholder no CE 0001 be approved, with discretion exercised to
award up to 6.66 compensatory added years, according to age and
length of service, enabling retirement to take effect on 30
September 2006.
DECISION:
(A)
That an appropriate external advisor be appointed, to
provide an independent view on capacity within the remaining
establishment of Chief Officers and other Senior Managers and
prepare a report to inform the above decision at Council on
20th September 2006; and
(B)
That the cost
of this work be funded from part of the earmarked
reserve established in
the Budget for HR-related legal advice.
Alternative Options
To reject or amend the proposals contained within the
report.
Reasons for the Decision:
(a)
Proper consideration must be given to maintaining effective
leadership in the strategic management of the Council. Any new
arrangements must be seen to deliver effective organisational
management and must establish clear lines for reporting,
responsibility and accountability. An external advisor would
provide an independent view on these matters.
(b)
There is a potential for the Council to achieve
organisational/cost savings and this would assist in improving the
Council's future sustainability.
82.
APPLICATION FOR VOLUNTARY REDUNDANCY AND EARLY RETIREMENT
(PARAGRAPH 1)
The Board considered the report of Councillor John Hatfield,
Portfolio Holder for Human Resources.
The report contained details of an application for voluntary
redundancy and Early retirement from Postholder no DSC
0001.
RECOMMENDATION TO COUNCIL:
(A)
That the application for voluntary redundancy and
early retirement from postholder no DSC 0001 be approved,
with discretion exercised to award full redundancy
compensation based on actual salary and up
to 4.44 compensatory added years to
pension, proportionately according to age and length
of service, enabling redundancy and early retirement to take
effect on 30 September 2006; and
(B)
That the related post of Secretarial Assistant be deleted from
the establishment and the current post-holder redeployed,
as appropriate.
Alternative Options
To reject or amend the proposals contained within the
report.
Reasons for the Decision:
There is a potential for the Council to achieve
organisational efficiencies / cost savings and
this would assist in improving the Council's future financial
sustainability
................................................................Signed